A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of self-management interventions in people with a stoma
- PMID: 34708416
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.15085
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of self-management interventions in people with a stoma
Abstract
Aims: Explore the evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effect of self-management interventions on quality of life, self-management skills and self-efficacy, and to explore which intervention characteristics are associated with effectiveness.
Design: Systematic review.
Data sources: A search of the literature was conducted in these databases: MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID) and PsychINFO (OVID) from January 2000 to February 2020.
Review methods: Studies were included if participants had a bowel stoma, were over the age of 18 and the design was a randomized controlled trial of a self-management programme. The outcome measures for this review were quality of life, self-management skills and self-efficacy. The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy was used to code interventions for underlying components and alongside other intervention characteristics, associations with improvements in outcomes were explored.
Results: The search identified 3141 articles, 16 of which were eligible. A meta-analysis of self-efficacy scores from five studies (N = 536) found an improvement in those that received the self-management intervention at follow-up with a 12-point mean difference compared with the usual care group. Effects on quality of life and self-management skills were mixed, and meta-analyses of these data were not possible. Across 13 studies an average of 10 behaviour change techniques were used with, credible source (e.g. nurse, doctor, therapist) (n = 13), instruction on how to perform the behaviour (n = 13), demonstration of the behaviour (n = 12) used most often. The behaviour change technique of self-monitoring was associated with an improvement in quality of life. The involvement of a nurse was associated with higher self-efficacy and self-management skills.
Conclusion: This review suggests that self-management interventions can increase peoples' self-efficacy for managing their stoma.
Impact: A standardized approach to the reporting of interventions and the measures used is needed in future studies to better understand the effect on quality of life and self-management skills.
Keywords: meta-analysis; nurses; quality of life; self-efficacy; self-management; stoma; systematic review.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ayling, K., Brierley, S., Johnson, B., Heller, S., & Eiser, C. (2015). Efficacy of theory-based interventions for young people with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12131
-
- Barlow, J., Wright, C., Sheasby, J., Turner, A., & Hainsworth, J. (2002). Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Education and Counseling, 48, 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00032-0
-
- Borwell, B. (2013). Continuity of care for the stoma patient: Psychological considerations. British Journal of Community Nursing, 14(8), 326-331. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2009.14.8.43511
-
- Burch, J. (2004). The management and care of people with stoma complications. British Journal of Nursing, 13(6), 307-308. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2004.13.6.12526
-
- Carlsson, E., Berndtsson, I., Hallen, A. M., Lindholm, E., & Persson, E. (2010). Concerns and quality of life before surgery and during the recovery period in patients with rectal cancer and an ostomy. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 37(6), 654-661. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181f90f0c
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
