Lessons Learned from Infants with Late Detection of Critical Congenital Heart Disease
- PMID: 34709442
- DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02760-5
Lessons Learned from Infants with Late Detection of Critical Congenital Heart Disease
Abstract
Late detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) is multifactorial and ill defined. We investigated the results of pulse oximetry screening (POS) and points in the care chain that contribute to delayed detection of CCHD. The medical records of 13 infants with delayed detection at a single pediatric cardiac center between 2013 and 2016 were identified and reviewed. Left heart obstructive lesions were the most common diagnosis (n = 8; 62%) and included coarctation of the aorta (n = 6), interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defect (n = 1), and critical aortic stenosis (n = 1). Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) (n = 2), truncus arteriosus (n = 1), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (n = 1), and total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (n = 1) made up the remainder of the conditions. Routine prenatal care was reported in most infants (10/13). Infants with late detection had either a true negative POS (10/13 infants) or no POS performed (3/13 infants). At the time of detection, 5/6 (83%) infants with coarctation had normal pulse oximetry values, whereas 6/7 (86%) infants with other CCHD developed abnormal pulse oximetry values. At diagnosis, 11/13 (85%) infants had significant signs or symptoms of clinical deterioration; only 2 infants were completely asymptomatic. Late detection of CCHD is uncommon and multifactorial. Eliminating late detection is dependent upon improving detection on screening obstetrical ultrasounds, enforcement of universal POS, and attention to the neonatal physical exam.
Keywords: Detection of critical congenital heart disease; Newborn CCHD screening false negatives; Pulse oximetry screening.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Granelli ADW, Wennergren M, Sandberg K et al (2009) Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39 821 newborns. BMJ 338(2):a3037. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3037 - DOI
-
- Plana MN, Zamora J, Suresh G, Fernandez-Pineda L, Thangaratinam S, Ewer AK (2018) Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD011912. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011912.pub2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zhao Q, Ma X, Ge X et al (2014) Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study. Lancet 384(9945):747–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60198-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Executive Committee, Mahle WT, Martin GR et al (2012) Endorsement of health and human services recommendation for pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 129(1):190–192. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3211 - DOI
-
- Abouk R, Grosse SD, Ailes EC, Oster ME (2017) Association of US State implementation of new born screening policies for critical congenital heart disease with early infant cardiac deaths. JAMA 318(21):2111–2118. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17627 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
