Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec 20;39(36):4049-4060.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01181. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study

Othman Al-Sawaf et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The CLL14 study has established one-year fixed-duration treatment of venetoclax and obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi) for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. With all patients off treatment for at least three years, we report a detailed analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and long-term outcome of patients treated in the CLL14 study.

Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of obinutuzumab with 12 cycles of venetoclax or 12 cycles of chlorambucil (Clb-Obi). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included rates of undetectable MRD and overall survival. To analyze MRD kinetics, a population-based growth model with nonlinear mixed effects approach was developed.

Results: Of 432 patients, 216 were assigned to Ven-Obi and 216 to Clb-Obi. Three months after treatment completion, 40% of patients in the Ven-Obi arm (7% in the Clb-Obi arm) had undetectable MRD levels < 10-6 by next-generation sequencing in peripheral blood. Median MRD doubling time was longer after Ven-Obi than Clb-Obi therapy (median 80 v 69 days). At a median follow-up of 52.4 months, a sustained significant PFS improvement was observed in the Ven-Obi arm compared with Clb-Obi (median not reached v 36.4 months; hazard ratio 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45; P < .0001). The estimated 4-year PFS rate was 74.0% in the Ven-Obi and 35.4% in the Clb-Obi arm. No difference in overall survival was observed (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .49). No new safety signals occurred.

Conclusion: Appearance of MRD after Ven-Obi is significantly slower than that after Clb-Obi with more effective MRD reduction. These findings translate into a superior long-term efficacy with the majority of Ven-Obi-treated patients remaining in remission.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02242942.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Othman Al-SawafHonoraria: Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, BeiGeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences, AbbVieResearch Funding: BeiGene (Inst), Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Janssen/Pharmacyclics (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag Tong LuEmployment: Genentech/RocheStock and Other Ownership Interests: RochePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: P36418-US Title: Methods and systems for placebo response modeling Michael Z. LiaoEmployment: Genentech/RocheStock and Other Ownership Interests: Roche, Amgen Anesh PanchalEmployment: Genentech/Roche Travers ChingEmployment: Adaptive BiotechnologiesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Adaptive Biotechnologies Maneesh TandonEmployment: Roche (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Roche Pharma AG Anna-Maria FinkResearch Funding: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Eugen TauschConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, AbbVie, Janssen-CilagTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Matthias RitgenHonoraria: Roche, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, MSDConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Roche, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Partial patent holder, only intellectual propertyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Takeda Sebastian BöttcherHonoraria: Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, SanofiConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, JanssenResearch Funding: Janssen (Inst) Karl-Anton KreuzerHonoraria: Roche, AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, AbbVieResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst)Expert Testimony: Roche, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AbbVie Brenda ChylaEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Dale MilesEmployment: GenentechStock and Other Ownership Interests: GenentechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genentech Clemens-Martin WendtnerHonoraria: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences Barbara EichhorstHonoraria: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Hexal, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Oxford Biomedica, Miltenyi BiotecConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, AbbVie, Novartis, Celgene, AstraZeneca, ArQuleSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, AbbVie, NovartisResearch Funding: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Beijing Genomics InstituteTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Stephan StilgenbauerHonoraria: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenSpeakers' Bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenResearch Funding: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, JanssenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Janssen Yanwen JiangEmployment: GenentechStock and Other Ownership Interests: Genentech Michael HallekHonoraria: Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Genentech/Roche, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Roche/Genentech, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen Kirsten FischerHonoraria: AbbVie, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: RocheNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Follow-up month 3 (ie, 2 months after treatment completion) minimal residual disease status by next-generation sequencing on the basis of intention-to-treat population. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; MRD, minimal residual disease; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Sankey plot for MRD levels by NGS between cycle 7 and FUm3 (ie, 2 months after treatment completion) in the Ven-Obi arm (patients during Ven-Obi treatment). (B) Waterfall plot for the 14 patients with detectable MRD (≥ 10−4) at FUm3 in the Ven-Obi arm and available MRD assessment at cycle 7 by NGS, with each bar representing absolute log changes from cycle 7 to FUm3 per patient. FUm3, follow-up month 3; H-MRD, high minimal residual disease; L-MRD, low minimal residual disease; MRD, minimal residual disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; PD, progressive disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
(A) Model calibration for (left) Clb-Obi and (right) Ven-Obi arms. (B) Time to MRD doubling and (C) time to MRD 10−2 in days, predicted by the growth model. (D) Time to MRD conversion (≥ 10−4) according to the treatment arm, from EoT. (E) Time to MRD conversion (≥ 10−4) according to the treatment arm and BM MRD status, from EoT. (F) PFS according to BM MRD status, from last treatment exposure. BM, bone marrow; Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; EoT, end of treatment; H-MRD, high minimal residual disease; L-MRD, low minimal residual disease; MRD, minimal residual disease; PFS, progression-free survival; uMRD, undetectable minimal residual disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Sankey plot showing MRD levels, measured by next-generation sequencing, from baseline to latest FU visit in the (A) Ven-Obi (n = 216) and (B) Clb-Obi (n = 216) arm. Percentages are provided in relation to the intention-to-treat population. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; FU, follow-up; H-MRD, high minimal residual disease; L-MRD, low minimal residual disease; MRD, minimal residual disease; PD, progressive disease; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
Kaplan-Meier analyses for PFS according to (A) the study arm, (B) status of TP53 aberrations and study arm, and (C) IGHV status and study arm. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.
FIG 6.
FIG 6.
Kaplan-Meier analysis for (A) TTNT per study arm and (B) OS per study arm. Clb-Obi, chlorambucil-obinutuzumab; OS, overall survival; TTNT, time to next anti-leukemic treatment; Ven-Obi, venetoclax-obinutuzumab.

References

    1. Del Giudice I, Raponi S, Della Starza I, et al. : Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A new goal? Front Oncol 9:689, 2019 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson M, Brander D, Nabhan C, et al. : Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel agents: A review. JAMA Oncol 4:394-400, 2018 - PubMed
    1. Rawstron AC, Fazi C, Agathangelidis A, et al. : A complementary role of multiparameter flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing for minimal residual disease detection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: An European Research Initiative on CLL study. Leukemia 30:929-936, 2016 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ching T, Duncan ME, Newman-Eerkes T, et al. : Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. BMC Cancer 20:612, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Sawaf O, Zhang C, Tandon M, et al. : Venetoclax plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL14): Follow-up results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 21:1188-1200, 2020 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data