Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Summer;15(3):188-196.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.032. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Effect of three different veneering techniques on the stress distribution and in vitro fatigue behavior of core-veneer all-ceramic fixed partial dentures

Affiliations

Effect of three different veneering techniques on the stress distribution and in vitro fatigue behavior of core-veneer all-ceramic fixed partial dentures

Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021 Summer.

Abstract

Background. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of the veneering technique on the tensile stress distribution and survival of full-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Methods. A three-dimensional model of an FDP was modeled on a second premolar and a second molar with a pontic between them for finite element analysis (FEA). The groups were divided according to the veneering technique: conventional stratification, rapid layer, and CAD-on techniques. A mesh control test determined the number of elements and nodes. The materials' properties were attributed to each solid component with isotropic, homogeneous, and linear elastic behavior. For the in vitro fatigue test (n=30), the FDPs were cemented on dentin analog abutments and submitted to 2×106 mechanical cycles (100 N at 3 Hz). Results. Maximum principal stress showed that the connector between the pontic and the second molar concentrated higher stresses, regardless of the techniques: Rapid layer (6 MPa) > CAD-on (5.5 MPa) > conventional stratification (4 MPa). The conventional stratification technique concentrated high stresses at the interface between the framework and veneering ceramic (2 MPa), followed by the rapid layer (1.8 MPa) and CAD-on (1.5 MPa) techniques. The crowns fabricated using the rapid layer and CAD-on techniques exhibited a 100% survival rate, while the conventional stratification group had 0% survival. Conclusion. Even with similar stress distribution between the veneering techniques, the conventional stratification technique was more prone to failure under fatigue due to higher defects incorporated than CAD-on and rapid layer techniques.

Keywords: Computer-aided design; Dental materials; Fatigue; Finite element analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 7

References

    1. Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Spagnuolo G, Gherlone E, Sorrentino R. Fourteen-year evaluation of posterior zirconia-based three-unit fixed dental prostheses: a prospective clinical study of all ceramic prosthesis. J Dent. 2020;101:103419. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103419. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lima JC, Tribst JP, Anami LC, de Melo RM, Moura DM, Souza RO. et al. Long-term fracture load of all-ceramic crowns: effects of veneering ceramic thickness, application techniques, and cooling protocol. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(11):e1078–e85. doi: 10.4317/jced.57352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26(1):31–41. - PubMed
    1. de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Contreras L, Ribeiro FC, Anami LC, Camargo S, Jorge A. et al. Monolithic ceramics: effect of finishing techniques on surface properties, bacterial adhesion and cell viability. Oper Dent. 2018;43(3):315–25. doi: 10.2341/17-011-l. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Tribst JPM, Venturini AB, Anami LC, Bonfante EA, Bottino MA. et al. Survival probability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: effect of surface condition and fatigue test load profile. Dent Mater. 2020;36(6):808–15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.029. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources