Digital Predictors of Morbidity, Hospitalization, and Mortality Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 34713066
- PMCID: PMC8521803
- DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.602093
Digital Predictors of Morbidity, Hospitalization, and Mortality Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
The widespread adoption of digital health technologies such as smartphone-based mobile applications, wearable activity trackers and Internet of Things systems has rapidly enabled new opportunities for predictive health monitoring. Leveraging digital health tools to track parameters relevant to human health is particularly important for the older segments of the population as old age is associated with multimorbidity and higher care needs. In order to assess the potential of these digital health technologies to improve health outcomes, it is paramount to investigate which digitally measurable parameters can effectively improve health outcomes among the elderly population. Currently, there is a lack of systematic evidence on this topic due to the inherent heterogeneity of the digital health domain and the lack of clinical validation of both novel prototypes and marketed devices. For this reason, the aim of the current study is to synthesize and systematically analyse which digitally measurable data may be effectively collected through digital health devices to improve health outcomes for older people. Using a modified PICO process and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework, we provide the results of a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis of digitally measurable predictors of morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality among older adults aged 65 or older. These findings can inform both technology developers and clinicians involved in the design, development and clinical implementation of digital health technologies for elderly citizens.
Keywords: digital health (eHealth); elderly; hospitalization-; meta-analysis; mortality; predictor; systematic (literature) review.
Copyright © 2021 Daniolou, Rapp, Haase, Ruppert, Wittwer, Scoccia Pappagallo, Pandis, Kressig and Ienca.
Conflict of interest statement
ARa, ARu, and MW were employed by Clever.Care AG. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This study was funded by Innosuisse- Swiss Innovation Agency, Grant Number: 40158.1 INNO-ICT. This funding scheme is purposively designed to facilitate and promote collaboration between academia and private companies.
Figures
References
-
- Lupton D. The Quantified Self. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons; (2016).
-
- Morgan J. Gaming for dementia research: a quest to save the brain. Lancet Neurol. (2016) 15:1313. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30123-5 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
