Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 16:3:594971.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.594971. eCollection 2021.

Success Factors of Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare

Affiliations

Success Factors of Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare

Justus Wolff et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has demonstrated high efficiency in academic research, while only few, and predominantly small, real-world AI applications exist in the preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic contexts. Our identification and analysis of success factors for the implementation of AI aims to close the gap between recent years' significant academic AI advancements and the comparably low level of practical application in healthcare. Methods: A literature and real life cases analysis was conducted in Scopus and OpacPlus as well as the Google advanced search database. The according search queries have been defined based on success factor categories for AI implementation derived from a prior World Health Organization survey about barriers of adoption of Big Data within 125 countries. The eligible publications and real life cases were identified through a catalog of in- and exclusion criteria focused on concrete AI application cases. These were then analyzed to deduct and discuss success factors that facilitate or inhibit a broad-scale implementation of AI in healthcare. Results: The analysis revealed three categories of success factors, namely (1) policy setting, (2) technological implementation, and (3) medical and economic impact measurement. For each of them a set of recommendations has been deducted: First, a risk adjusted policy frame is required that distinguishes between precautionary and permissionless principles, and differentiates among accountability, liability, and culpability. Second, a "privacy by design" centered technology infrastructure shall be applied that enables practical and legally compliant data access. Third, the medical and economic impact need to be quantified, e.g., through the measurement of quality-adjusted life years while applying the CHEERS and PRISMA reporting criteria. Conclusions: Private and public institutions can already today leverage AI implementation based on the identified results and thus drive the translation from scientific development to real world application. Additional success factors could include trust-building measures, data categorization guidelines, and risk level assessments and as the success factors are interlinked, future research should elaborate on their optimal interaction to utilize the full potential of AI in real world application.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; digital health; impact measurement; policy framework; public health; success factor; technology assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Barriers to adoption of big data for health globally—survey of 125 countries by the WHO (14).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methodology for the identification of academic literature and real-world AI application cases in healthcare (authors).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prisma flow diagram for academic literature and real world case research (authors).
Figure 4
Figure 4
AI integration into routine healthcare processes (authors).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Policy framework pyramid (authors).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Overview of cost aggregation methods in healthcare (39).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Overview of success factors facilitating the implementation of AI in healthcare (authors).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. German Bundestag . Available online at: https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/19/134/1913438.pdf
    1. Bundesanzeiger Verlag www.bundesanzeiger-verlag.de. Das Bundesgesetzblatt (BGBl.) - Bundesanzeiger Verlag. Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. (2020). Available online at: https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/text.xav?SID=&tf=xaver.component.Text_0&t...
    1. Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. (2015) 132:1920–30. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park SH, Han K. Methodologic guide for evaluating clinical performance and effect of artificial intelligence technology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Radiology. (2018) 286:800–9. 10.1148/radiol.2017171920 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng. (2018) 2:719–31. 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z - DOI - PubMed