Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 31:3:610006.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.610006. eCollection 2021.

Remote Digital Measurement of Facial and Vocal Markers of Major Depressive Disorder Severity and Treatment Response: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Remote Digital Measurement of Facial and Vocal Markers of Major Depressive Disorder Severity and Treatment Response: A Pilot Study

Anzar Abbas et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: Multiple machine learning-based visual and auditory digital markers have demonstrated associations between major depressive disorder (MDD) status and severity. The current study examines if such measurements can quantify response to antidepressant treatment (ADT) with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine uptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Methods: Visual and auditory markers were acquired through an automated smartphone task that measures facial, vocal, and head movement characteristics across 4 weeks of treatment (with time points at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks) on ADT (n = 18). MDD diagnosis was confirmed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was collected concordantly to assess changes in MDD severity. Results: Patient responses to ADT demonstrated clinically and statistically significant changes in the MADRS [F (2, 34) = 51.62, p < 0.0001]. Additionally, patients demonstrated significant increases in multiple digital markers including facial expressivity, head movement, and amount of speech. Finally, patients demonstrated significantly decreased frequency of fear and anger facial expressions. Conclusion: Digital markers associated with MDD demonstrate validity as measures of treatment response.

Keywords: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; antidepressant treatment; computer vision; digital biomarker; digital phenotyping; machine learning; major depressive disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

At the time of the study, AAb, VY, VK and IG-L were employees of AiCure and held stock options in AiCure. CS, AAg, SM, and ME were employees of Adams Clinical, and CS was also an employee of Karuna Therapeutics. The authors declare that the study was jointly funded by AiCure, LLC and Adams Clinical, both of which may benefit from research reported in the manuscript and were involved in study design and execution. Adams Clinical conducted patient recruitment, enrollment, and clinical assessments. AiCure developed methods for digital phenotyping and provided software tools for remote collection of video data used. Both AiCure and Adams Clinical were involved in subsequent data analysis, interpretation, and presentation of findings.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Depiction of the smartphone-based assessment that all individuals completed. Video and audio of participant responses were recorded during the assessment and used to quantify behavioral characteristics and subsequently measure digital markers of major depressive disorder (MDD) severity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response to treatment as measured by two independent assessments. Mean for each time point and standard error bars are shown. Results demonstrate treatment's significant effect on digital markers, which are highly concordant with change in depression symptom severity. (A) Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores acquired at baseline (BL), week 2, and week 4 showed significant decrease in response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) [F(2, 34) = 51.62, p < 0.0001]. (B) Overall facial expressivity measured in response to positive [F(2, 28) = 40.66; p < 0.0001], neutral [F(2, 28) = 32.6; p < 0.0001], and negative [F(2, 28) = 36.95; p < 0.0001] images demonstrated a significant increase in response to ADT as MADRS scores decreased. (C) Percentage of frames with voice measured in response to positive [F(2, 26) = 3.59; p = 0.04], neutral [F(2, 26) = 5.59; p 0.009], and negative [F(2, 28) = 4.65; p = 0.02] images also demonstrated a significant increase in response to ADT as MADRS scores decreased. All values in (B,C) were normalized between 0 and 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lux V, Kendler KS. Deconstructing major depression: a validation study of the DSM-IV symptomatic criteria. Psychol Med. (2010) 40:1679–90. 10.1017/S0033291709992157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ostergaard SD, Jensen SOW, Bech P. The heterogeneity of the depressive syndrome: when numbers get serious. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2011) 124:495–6. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01744.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uher R, Maier W, Hauser J, Marusic A, Schmael C, Mors O, et al. . Differential efficacy of escitalopram and nortriptyline on dimensional measures of depression. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. (2009) 194:252–9. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.057554 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaracz J, Gattner K, Moczko J, Hauser J. Comparison of the effects of escitalopram and nortriptyline on painful symptoms in patients with major depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2015) 37:36–9. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.10.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med. (2013) 11:126. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources