Remote Digital Measurement of Facial and Vocal Markers of Major Depressive Disorder Severity and Treatment Response: A Pilot Study
- PMID: 34713091
- PMCID: PMC8521884
- DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.610006
Remote Digital Measurement of Facial and Vocal Markers of Major Depressive Disorder Severity and Treatment Response: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Objectives: Multiple machine learning-based visual and auditory digital markers have demonstrated associations between major depressive disorder (MDD) status and severity. The current study examines if such measurements can quantify response to antidepressant treatment (ADT) with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine uptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Methods: Visual and auditory markers were acquired through an automated smartphone task that measures facial, vocal, and head movement characteristics across 4 weeks of treatment (with time points at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks) on ADT (n = 18). MDD diagnosis was confirmed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was collected concordantly to assess changes in MDD severity. Results: Patient responses to ADT demonstrated clinically and statistically significant changes in the MADRS [F (2, 34) = 51.62, p < 0.0001]. Additionally, patients demonstrated significant increases in multiple digital markers including facial expressivity, head movement, and amount of speech. Finally, patients demonstrated significantly decreased frequency of fear and anger facial expressions. Conclusion: Digital markers associated with MDD demonstrate validity as measures of treatment response.
Keywords: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; antidepressant treatment; computer vision; digital biomarker; digital phenotyping; machine learning; major depressive disorder.
Copyright © 2021 Abbas, Sauder, Yadav, Koesmahargyo, Aghjayan, Marecki, Evans and Galatzer-Levy.
Conflict of interest statement
At the time of the study, AAb, VY, VK and IG-L were employees of AiCure and held stock options in AiCure. CS, AAg, SM, and ME were employees of Adams Clinical, and CS was also an employee of Karuna Therapeutics. The authors declare that the study was jointly funded by AiCure, LLC and Adams Clinical, both of which may benefit from research reported in the manuscript and were involved in study design and execution. Adams Clinical conducted patient recruitment, enrollment, and clinical assessments. AiCure developed methods for digital phenotyping and provided software tools for remote collection of video data used. Both AiCure and Adams Clinical were involved in subsequent data analysis, interpretation, and presentation of findings.
Figures


References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources