Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 23:3:725088.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088. eCollection 2021.

The Sociotechnical Ethics of Digital Health: A Critique and Extension of Approaches From Bioethics

Affiliations

The Sociotechnical Ethics of Digital Health: A Critique and Extension of Approaches From Bioethics

James A Shaw et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

The widespread adoption of digital technologies raises important ethical issues in health care and public health. In our view, understanding these ethical issues demands a perspective that looks beyond the technology itself to include the sociotechnical system in which it is situated. In this sense, a sociotechnical system refers to the broader collection of material devices, interpersonal relationships, organizational policies, corporate contracts, and government regulations that shape the ways in which digital health technologies are adopted and used. Bioethical approaches to the assessment of digital health technologies are typically confined to ethical issues raised by features of the technology itself. We suggest that an ethical perspective confined to functions of the technology is insufficient to assess the broader impact of the adoption of technologies on the care environment and the broader health-related ecosystem of which it is a part. In this paper we review existing approaches to the bioethics of digital health, and draw on concepts from design ethics and science & technology studies (STS) to critique a narrow view of the bioethics of digital health. We then describe the sociotechnical system produced by digital health technologies when adopted in health care environments, and outline the various considerations that demand attention for a comprehensive ethical analysis of digital health technologies in this broad perspective. We conclude by outlining the importance of social justice for ethical analysis from a sociotechnical perspective.

Keywords: bioethics; digital health; ethics; science and technology studies (STS); telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Henwood F, Marent B. Understanding digital health: productive tensions at the intersection of sociology of health and science and technology studies. Sociol Health Illness. (2019) 41:1–15. 10.1111/1467-9566.12898 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marent B, Henwood F. Digital health. In: Routledge International Handjournal of Critical Issues in Health and Illness. New York: Routledge; (2021). 10.4324/9781003185215-24 - DOI
    1. Lupton D. Digital Health: critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge; (2017). 10.4324/9781315648835 - DOI
    1. Haluza D, Naszay M, Stockinger A, Jungwirth D. Prevailing opinions on connected health in Austria: results from an online survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 13:813. 10.3390/ijerph13080813 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montagni I, Cariou T, Feuillet T, Langlois E, Tzourio C. Exploring digital health use and opinions of university students: field survey study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. (2018) 6:e65. 10.2196/mhealth.9131 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources