Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 1;50(8):1137-1153.
doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001896.

Quality of Life Instruments and Trajectories After Pancreatic Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Quality of Life Instruments and Trajectories After Pancreatic Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review

Clare Toms et al. Pancreas. .

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to investigate the instruments available to measure quality of life (QOL) after pancreatic cancer surgery and to describe short- and long-term QOL outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was completed using PubMed, Embase, and Medline from inception to March 2019. Studies investigating QOL outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery who were 18 years or older were included. The main outcomes of interest were QOL instruments and short (≤6 months) and long term (>6 months) QOL outcomes. The overarching domains of physical, psychosocial, overall QOL, symptoms, and other were used to summarize QOL outcomes. Thirty-five studies reporting on 3573 patients were included. Fifteen unique QOL instruments were identified, of which 4 were disease-specific instruments. Most of the included studies reported no changes in QOL at short- and long-term follow-ups for the overarching domains. No difference in QOL outcomes was reported between different surgical approaches, except laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy versus distal pancreatectomy. There are a wide range of instruments available to measure QOL outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgical patients, although only few are disease-specific. Most of the included studies reported no significant changes in QOL outcomes at short- or long-term follow-ups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol . 2016;22:9694–9705.
    1. Pezzilli R, Fantini L, Morselli-Labate AM. Pancreatectomy for pancreatic disease and quality of life. JOP . 2007;8(1 Suppl):118–131.
    1. CINSW. Pancreatic cancer—survival. 2019. Available at: https://www.cancer.nsw.gov.au/research-and-data/cancer-data-and-statisti... . Accessed February 10, 2020.
    1. Burmeister EA, O'Connell DL, Jordan SJ, et al. Factors associated with quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer in Australia. Med J Aust . 2016;205:459–465.
    1. Carrato A, Falcone A, Ducreux M, et al. A systematic review of the burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe: real-world impact on survival, quality of life and costs. J Gastrointest Cancer . 2015;46:201–211.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources