Evaluation of Sensitivity and Cost-Effectiveness of Molecular Methods for the Co-detection of Waterborne Pathogens in India
- PMID: 34714447
- DOI: 10.1007/s10126-021-10078-9
Evaluation of Sensitivity and Cost-Effectiveness of Molecular Methods for the Co-detection of Waterborne Pathogens in India
Abstract
Waterborne microbial diseases are regarded as a major public health concern, particularly in nations with poor sanitation, a lack of social awareness, and problems linked with low socioeconomic status. Waterborne pathogen identification using traditional culture methods is time-consuming and labor-intensive. As a result, there is a growing demand for quick pathogen detection technologies. High sensitivity, specificity, and rapidity are all advantages of using molecular techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in such instances. In this study, we designed multiplex PCR and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assays for the co-detection and enumeration of waterborne pathogens such as Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Yersinia enterocolitica, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Shigella spp. Specific primers were selected against the virulence and species-specific genes of the seven target pathogens. For all seven target organisms, the detection limits for conventional culture methods were in the range of 103-104 cells/ml. While employing multiplex PCR method in this study, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Shigella spp. have a detection sensitivity of 101 cells/ml, Vibrio cholerae and Aeromonas hydrophila have a detection sensitivity of 102 cells/ml, whereas Salmonella enterica, E. coli, and Yersinia enterocolitica have a detection sensitivity of only 103 cells/ml. According to our cost-benefit analysis, these molecular technologies are less expensive, with unit analysis costs of ₹52 and ₹173 for qPCR and multiplex PCR, respectively. Furthermore, all of the target genes had a detection limit of 1 cell/ml in qPCR. Because of their speed, sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness, these multiplex and qPCR assays could be employed for successful co-detection of aquatic pathogens.
Keywords: Co-detection; Drinking water; Enumeration; Multiplex PCR; Simultaneous detection; Waterborne pathogens; qPCR.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Ahmed W, Zhang Q, Ishii S, Hamilton K, Haas C (2018) Microfluidic quantification of multiple enteric and opportunistic bacterial pathogens in roof-harvested rainwater tank samples. Environ Monit Assess 190:105 - DOI
-
- Allegra S, Berger F, Berthelot P, Grattard F, Pozzetto B, Riffard S (2008) Use of flow cytometry to monitor Legionella viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7813–7816 - DOI
-
- Babu L, Reddy P, Murali HS, Batra HV (2013) Optimization and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of prominent foodborne pathogens of Enterobacteriaceae. Ann Microbiol 63:1591–1599 - DOI
-
- Balakrishna K, Murali HS, Batra HV (2010) Cloning, expression and characterization of attachment-invasion locus protein (Ail) of Yersinia enterocolitica and its utilization in rapid detection by immunoassays. Lett Appl Microbiol 50:131–137 - DOI
-
- CBHI (2018) National Health Profile 2018. New Delhi: Directorate General of Health Services
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous