Implementation of a youth violence prevention programme in primary care
- PMID: 34716179
- PMCID: PMC9063683
- DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044293
Implementation of a youth violence prevention programme in primary care
Abstract
Background and objectives: Youth violence is an alarming public health problem, yet, violence screening and interventions are not systematically offered in primary care (PC). This paper describes data from a pilot effectiveness-implementation trial of an efficacious youth violence prevention programme (SafERteens).
Methods: The study was conducted in two PC clinics: a university-affiliated satellite clinic and a community health centre. In phase 1, we obtained stakeholder feedback to customise the SafERteens package and enrolled a comparison group of adolescents (age 14-18) seeking care in two clinics. In phase 2, clinical staff delivered the SafERteens-PC intervention with adolescents, which is a single, behavioural health therapy session delivered one-on-one from clinic providers to youth patients, followed by text message (TM) reminders. In phase 3, we assessed planned maintenance. All participants reported past-year violent behaviour at intake and completed a 3-month follow-up assessment.
Results: Based on stakeholder interviews (n=13), we created a web-based SafERteens-PC programme package, including a three-item past-year violence screen, 30 min motivational interviewing-based brief intervention delivery tool, training videos and 2 months of TM boosters. We enrolled a comparison group (n=49) first, then an intervention group (n=61). Intervention delivery characteristics varied by clinic, including completion of intervention (75.9%; 62.5%), modality (100% delivered via telehealth; 60% via telehealth/40% in-person) and enrolment in TMs (81.8%; 55.0%); 91.8% completed the follow-up. Using an intention-to-treat approach, the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in severe peer aggression (p<0.05), anxiety (p<0.05) and substance use consequences (p<0.05) relative to the comparison group. Participant and staff feedback were positive and identified challenges to long-term implementation, such as lack of availability of reimbursement for youth violence prevention.
Conclusions: If these challenges could be addressed, routine provision of behavioural health services for violence prevention in PC could have high impact on health outcomes for adolescents.
Keywords: implementation / translation; interventions; primary care; violence; youth.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). WISQARS, 2018. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/mjury/wisqars/mdex.html [Accessed 12 Oct 2020].
-
- David-Ferdon C, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Dahlberg LL. A comprehensive technical package for the prevention of youth violence and associated risk behaviors, 2016. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/yv-technicalpackage.pdf
-
- Sigel E, Bublitz C JK. Examining primary care practitioners detection of youth at risk for violence injury and aggression. Pediatric Academic Society Poster Symposium, San Francisco, CA, 2006.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tables of summary health statistics for U.S. children: 2017 National health interview survey, 2017. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/SHS/tables.htm [Accessed 12 Oct 2020].
-
- Feinstein EC, Richter L, Foster SE. Addressing the critical health problem of adolescent substance use through health care, research, and public policy. J Adolesc Health 2012;50:431–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous