Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):1184.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07201-w.

Whether high government subsidies reduce the healthcare provision of township healthcare centers in rural China

Affiliations

Whether high government subsidies reduce the healthcare provision of township healthcare centers in rural China

Chi Shen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: China's government launched a large-scale healthcare reform from 2009. One of the main targets of this round reform was to improve the primary health care system. Major reforms for primary healthcare institutions include increasing government investment. However, there are insufficient empirical studies based on large sample to catch long-term effect of increased government subsidy and lack of sufficient incentives on township healthcare centers (THCs), therefore, this study aims to provide additional empirical evidence on the concern by conducting an empirical analysis of THCs in Shaanxi province in China.

Methods: We collected nine years (2009 to 2017) data of THCs from the Health Finance Annual Report System (HFARS) that was acquired from the Health Commission of Shaanxi Province. We applied two-way fixed effect model and continue difference-in-difference (DID) model to estimate the effect of percentage of government subsidy on medical provision.

Results: A clear jump of the average percentage of government subsidy to total revenue of THCs can be found in Shaanxi province in 2011, and the average percentage has been more than 60% after 2011. Continue DID models indicate every 1% percentage of government subsidy to total revenue increase after 2011 resulted in a decrease of 1.1 to 3.5% in THCs healthcare provision (1.9% in medical revenue, 1.2% in outpatient visit, 3.5% in total occupy beds of inpatient, 1.1% in surgery revenue, 2.1% in sickbed utilization rate). The results show that the THCs with high government subsidy reduce the number of medical services after 2011.

Conclusions: We think that it is no doubt that the government should take more responsibility for the financing of primary healthcare institutions, the problem is when government plays a central role in the financing and delivery of primary health care services, more effective incentives should be developed.

Keywords: China; Healthcare reform; Incentives; Township healthcare centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Zhongliang Zhou is a member of the editorial board of BMC Health Services Research journal. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stages of development of township health centers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The relationship between government subsidies and incentive to provide medical services in China’s THCs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Tread of percentage of subsidy of THCs from 2009 to 2017
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relationship between subsidy and in-hospital from 2009 to 2017

References

    1. Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and State Council . Opinions on Deepening Health System Reform. 2009.
    1. McCollum R, Chen L, ChenXiang T, Liu X, Starfield B, Jinhuan Z, Tolhurst R. Experiences with primary healthcare in Fuzhou, urban China, in the context of health sector reform: a mixed methods study: Experiences with primary healthcare in Fuzhou, China. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2014;29(2):e107–e126. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2165. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo Z, Guan X, Shi L. The impacts of implementation of National Essential Medicines Policies on primary healthcare institutions: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2698-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meng Q, Mills A, Wang L, Han Q. What can we learn from China’s health system reform? BMJ. 2019;365:l2349. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li X, Lu J, Hu S, Cheng K, De Maeseneer J, Meng Q, et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2584–2594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4. - DOI - PubMed