Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul 6;61(7):2915-2922.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab780.

New-onset versus relapsing giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab: 3-year results from a randomized controlled trial and extension

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

New-onset versus relapsing giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab: 3-year results from a randomized controlled trial and extension

John H Stone et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objective: Tocilizumab plus prednisone induces sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in patients with GCA. However, its long-term benefits in new-onset vs relapsing disease are uncertain, and the value of weekly vs every-other-week dosing has not been evaluated.

Methods: In Giant-Cell Arteritis Actemra (GiACTA) part 1, patients with new-onset or relapsing GCA received blinded tocilizumab weekly (TCZ QW), tocilizumab every-other-week (TCZ Q2W) or placebo for 52 weeks, with a prednisone taper. In part 2 (open-label), patients were treated at investigator discretion for 104 weeks. In this analysis, patients were evaluated according to their original treatment assignments, and outcomes beyond 52 weeks were assessed. Outcomes of interest included time to first flare and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure over 3 years according to baseline disease status.

Results: Part 1 enrolled 250 patients; 215 entered part 2. At baseline, 48% had new-onset disease and 52% had relapsing disease. In patients with new-onset and relapsing disease, the median time to first flare in the TCZ QW group was 577 and 575 days, respectively, vs 479 and 428 days with TCZ Q2W and 179 and 224 days with placebo; the median cumulative glucocorticoid dose was 3068 mg and 2191 mg with TCZ QW, 4080 mg and 2353 mg with TCZ Q2W, and 4639 mg and 6178 mg with placebo.

Conclusion: TCZ QW delayed the time to flare and reduced the cumulative glucocorticoid dose in patients with relapsing GCA and new-onset GCA. These data support initiating TCZ QW as part of first-line therapy in all patients with active GCA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01791153.

Keywords: biologic therapies; cardiovascular; clinical trials and methods; giant cell arteritis; inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>Fig</sc>. 1
Fig. 1
Time to first flare following clinical remission Time to first flare following clinical remission by disease status at baseline for (A) placebo versus weekly tocilizumab, relapsing and new-onset; (B) weekly versus every-other-week tocilizumab, relapsing; (C) weekly versus every-other-week tocilizumab, new-onset. Treatment groups refer to originally assigned treatment in part 1. Patients who were never in remission were censored at day 1, and patients who withdrew were censored at time of withdrawal. PBO: placebo; QW: once weekly; Q2W: every 2 weeks; TCZ: tocilizumab.
<sc>Fig</sc>. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative glucocorticoid dose Cumulative GC dose by disease status at baseline for placebo versus weekly tocilizumab. Treatment groups refer to originally assigned treatment in part 1. GC: glucocorticoid; PBO: placebo; QW: once weekly; TCZ: tocilizumab.

Comment in

  • Where do we go after GiACTA?
    Putman M, Sattui S, Conway R. Putman M, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Jul 6;61(7):2720-2721. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac010. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022. PMID: 35020808 No abstract available.

References

    1. Dejaco C, Duftner C, Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B.. The spectrum of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: revisiting the concept of the disease. Rheumatology 2017;56:506–15. - PubMed
    1. Serling-Boyd N, Stone JH.. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2020;32:201–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Restuccia G, Boiardi L, Cavazza A. et al. Flares in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis in northern Italy: characteristics and predictors in a long-term follow-up study. Medicine 2016;95:e3524. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Labarca C, Koster MJ, Crowson CS. et al. Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology 2016;55:347–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alba MA, Garcia-Martinez A, Prieto-Gonzalez S. et al. Relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis: prevalence, characteristics, and associated clinical findings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 106 patients. Medicine 2014;93:194–201. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data