Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 1;9(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00237-1.

Affective lability as a prospective predictor of subsequent bipolar disorder diagnosis: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Affective lability as a prospective predictor of subsequent bipolar disorder diagnosis: a systematic review

Rosie H Taylor et al. Int J Bipolar Disord. .

Abstract

Objectives: The early pathogenesis and precursors of Bipolar Disorder (BD) are poorly understood. There is some cross-sectional and retrospective evidence of affective lability as a predictor of BD, but this is subject to recall biases. The present review synthesises the prospective evidence examining affective lability and the subsequent development of BD at follow-up.

Methods: The authors performed a systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase (1960-June 2020) and conducted hand searches to identify studies assessing affective lability (according to a conceptually-inclusive definition) at baseline assessment in individuals without a BD diagnosis, and a longitudinal follow-up assessment of bipolar (spectrum) disorders. Results are reported according to the PRISMA guidelines, and the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guidelines were used to strengthen the narrative synthesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias (ROB).

Results: 11 articles describing 10 studies were included. Being identified as having affective lability at baseline was associated with an increased rate of bipolar diagnoses at follow-up; this association was statistically significant in six of eight studies assessing BD type I/II at follow-up and in all four studies assessing for bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD) criteria. Most studies received a 'fair' or 'poor' ROB grade.

Conclusions: Despite a paucity of studies, an overall association between prospectively-identified affective lability and a later diagnosis of BD or BSD is apparent with relative consistency between studies. This association and further longitudinal studies could inform future clinical screening of those who may be at risk of BD, with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and facilitate early intervention.

Keywords: Affective lability; Bipolar disorder; Bipolar spectrum; Mood instability; Predictor; Prospective; Risk-factor; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RS declares an honorarium from Lundbeck. AHY declares honoraria for speaking from Astra Zeneca, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, Sunovion; honoraria for consulting from Allergan, Livanova and Lundbeck, Sunovion, Janssen; and research grant support from Janssen. AU and RHT have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process. Study flow diagram showing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. BD = bipolar disorder

References

    1. Aiken CB, Weisler RH, Sachs GS. The bipolarity index: a clinician-rated measure of diagnostic confidence. J Affect Disord. 2015;177:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.02.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akiskal HS. The prevalent clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: beyond DSM-IV. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996;16(2):4S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199604001-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akiskal KK, Akiskal HS. The theoretical underpinnings of affective temperaments: implications for evolutionary foundations of bipolar disorder and human nature. J Affect Disord. 2005;85(1):231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akiskal HS, Maser JD, Zeller PJ, Endicott J, Coryell W, Keller M, et al. Switching from ‘unipolar’ to bipolar II: an 11-year prospective study of clinical and temperamental predictors in 559 patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(2):114–123. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950140032004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akiskal HS, Hantouche EG, Allilaire JF. Bipolar II with and without cyclothymic temperament: “dark” and “sunny” expressions of soft bipolarity. J Affect Disord. 2003;73(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00320-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources