The environmental impact of inhalers for asthma: A green challenge and a golden opportunity
- PMID: 34719810
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15135
The environmental impact of inhalers for asthma: A green challenge and a golden opportunity
Abstract
The propellants in metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) are powerful greenhouse gases, which account for approximately 13% of the NHS's carbon footprint related to the delivery of care. Most MDI use is in salbutamol relievers in patients with poorly controlled disease. The UK lags behind Europe in this regard, with greater reliance on salbutamol MDI and correspondingly greater greenhouse gas emissions, roughly treble that of our European neighbours. There has been a broad switch towards MDIs in asthma treatment in the UK over the last 20 years to reduce financial costs, such that the treatment for two-thirds of asthma patients in the UK is dominated by salbutamol MDI. Strategies that replace overuse of reliever MDIs with regimes emphasising inhaled corticosteroids have the potential to improve asthma control alongside significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Real-world evidence shows that once-daily long-acting combination dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) can improve compliance and asthma control, and reduce the carbon footprint of care. Similarly, maintenance and reliever therapy (MART), which uses combination reliever and inhaled steroids in one device (usually a DPI), can simplify therapy, improve asthma control and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Both treatment strategies are popular with patients, most of whom would be willing to change treatment to reduce their carbon footprint. By focussing on patients who are currently using high amounts of salbutamol MDI and prioritising inhaled steroids via DPIs, there are golden opportunities to make asthma care in the UK more effective, safer and greener.
Keywords: asthma; inhalation; respiratory medicine.
© 2021 British Pharmacological Society.
Comment in
-
Environmental risk of pharmaceuticals: Let us look at the whole package.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;88(8):3918-3919. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15311. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35318697 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Stein SW, Thiel CG. The history of therapeutic aerosols: A chronological review. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2017;30(1):20-41. https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2016.1297
-
- Molina MJ, Rowland FS. Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature. 1974;249(5460):810-812. https://doi.org/10.1038/249810a0
-
- Woodcock A. The president speaks: prevention is best: lessons from protecting the ozone layer. Thorax. 2012;67(12):1028-1031. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202628
-
- Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, et al. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2013.
-
- Global Warming Potential Values. https://www.ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/ghgp/Global-Warming-Pote.... Published 2014. Accessed January 17, 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
