Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):420-425.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1974.

Can 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Replace Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) with 2% Xylocaine for Pulp Therapy in Primary Mandibular Molars? A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Can 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Replace Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) with 2% Xylocaine for Pulp Therapy in Primary Mandibular Molars? A Systematic Review

Sunny P Tirupathi et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 May-Jun.

Abstract

Aim and objective: This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of 4% articaine buccal supraperiosteal/infiltration to that of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% xylocaine in providing pulpal anesthesia for carrying out pulp therapy of deciduous mandibular molars in children.

Materials and methods: PubMed, Cochrane Registry, and Ovid SP were searched in the timeframe between years 1991 and 2020 with appropriate MeSH terms. Full texts were selected only after a preliminary screening of relevant titles and abstracts.

Results: Five studies were involved for the final qualitative analysis. The parameter sought for was "Pain during pulp therapy after injection with buccal supraperiosteal/infiltration (4% articaine) or IANB (2% lignocaine) in primary mandibular molars. Three studies evaluated objective pain (operator reported) during pulp therapy, reported significantly lower pain scores with articaine buccal infiltration (BI). Among the two studies that evaluated subjective pain, one study reported a significantly lower pain score with the articaine BI group. The other study reported no difference statistically between both groups.

Conclusion: Under the bounds of this systematic review, BI with 4% articaine might be equivalent to IANB with 2% lignocaine for providing pulpal anesthesia required for pulp therapy procedures in primary mandibular molars; however, the quality of evidence is low, more number of well-controlled studies with adequate sized sample should be conducted out to verify the same.

How to cite this article: Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S, Ganesh M, et al. Can 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Replace Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) with 2% Xylocaine for Pulp Therapy in Primary Mandibular Molars? A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(3):420-425.

Keywords: Articaine; Buccal; Children; Inferior alveolar nerve block; Infiltration; Lignocaine; Pulp therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Flowchart 1
Flowchart 1
Flowchart
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Risk of bias of all the included studies

References

    1. Kaufman E, Epstein JB, Naveh E, et al. A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections. Anesth Prog. 2005;52(4):122–127. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006. (2005)52[122:ASP]2.0.CO;2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hwang TJ, Hsu SC, Huang QF, et al. Age changes in location of mandibular foramen. Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1990;9(3):98–103. - PubMed
    1. Pourkazemi M, Erfanparast L, Sheykhgermchi S, et al. Is inferior alveolar nerve block sufficient for routine dental treatment in 4- to 6-year-old children? Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;10(4):369–372. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abu Sharkh M, Khalil A, Ong-Ly C, et al. Buccal injection of articaine to anesthetize the palatal mucosa. Gen Dent. 2009;67(3):26–30. - PubMed
    1. Al-Mahalawy H, Abuohashish H, Chathoth S, et al. Articaine versus lidocaine concentration in the palatal tissues after supraperiosteal buccal infiltration anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(2):315.e1–315.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.10.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources