Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 25;13(9):e18271.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.18271. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence and Treatment Outcome

Affiliations

Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence and Treatment Outcome

Maheswaran Archunan et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an incapacitating complication. The prevalence and causes leading to stiffness are not clearly determined. The aim of the study was to ascertain the prevalence, determine the influencing factors, and evaluate the efficacy of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) as a treatment option. Method Retrospective review of consecutive series of 1350 primary TKA over a 28-month period. For the purpose of the study, stiffness was defined as flexion contracture of >15 degrees and/or flexion of <75 degrees. Demographic data included co-morbidities, previous knee surgery, pre-operative and post-operative range of movement, anaesthetic techniques and use of nerve blocks, type of prosthesis, ligament balancing including release, mobility post-surgery, patient motivation, physiotherapy, complications, and final range of motion post-MUA. Results Of the 1350 patients evaluated, 33 (2.44%) had stiffness defined by the above-outlined criteria and required intervention. Thirty-one patients (2.29%) underwent MUA as a first-line treatment. No complications arose following MUA. One patient (0.07%) required arthroscopic arthrolysis while another patient (0.07%) required revision arthroplasty due to patellar mal-tracking. Following manipulation, mean flexion contracture decreased from 8 degrees to 3.6 degrees, and mean flexion improved from 51.8 degrees to 93.2 degrees. Arc of motion improved in 100% of patients but it is important to note that multiple manipulations were performed in seven patients. Conclusion Stiffness after TKA can be difficult to treat and can result in prolonged morbidity and dissatisfaction. This retrospective study highlights the effectiveness of manipulation under anaesthesia as a first-line treatment option leading to improved outcomes especially if done early.

Keywords: arthrofibrosis; joint stiffness; manipulation under anaesthesia; pain; post operative complication; rehabilitation; total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Improvement in the degree of flexion achieved and fixed flexion deformity following MUA
MUA: manipulation under anaesthesia
Figure 2
Figure 2. Arc of motion
Figure 3
Figure 3. Improved range of motion following MUA: performed >8 weeks vs performed <8 weeks
MUA: manipulation under anaesthesia
Figure 4
Figure 4. Number of MUA required by patients
MUA: manipulation under anaesthesia

References

    1. Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study. Woolhead GM, Donovan JL, Dieppe PA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:1032–1037. - PubMed
    1. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes, treatment modalities and results. Rodríguez-Merchán EC. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4:602–610. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Nelson CL, Kim J, Lotke PA. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 1:264–270. - PubMed
    1. Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty. Christensen CP, Crawford JJ, Olin MD, Vail TP. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:409–415. - PubMed
    1. Natural history of fixed flexion deformity following total knee replacement: a prospective five-year study. Aderinto J, Brenkel IJ, Chan P. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:934–936. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources