Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 15:8:666898.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.666898. eCollection 2021.

The Animal Welfare Science of Working Dogs: Current Perspectives on Recent Advances and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

The Animal Welfare Science of Working Dogs: Current Perspectives on Recent Advances and Future Directions

Mia L Cobb et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Working dogs are prevalent throughout our societies, assisting people in diverse contexts, from explosives detection and livestock herding, to therapy partners. Our scientific exploration and understanding of animal welfare have grown dramatically over the last decade. As community attitudes toward the use of animals continue to change, applying this new knowledge of welfare to improve the everyday lives of working dogs will underpin the sustainability of working with dogs in these roles. The aim of this report was to consider the scientific studies of working dogs from the last decade (2011-2021) in relation to modern ethics, human interaction, and the five domains of animal welfare: nutrition, environment, behavioral interaction, physical health, and mental state. Using this framework, we were able to analyze the concept and contribution of working dog welfare science. Noting some key advances across the full working dog life cycle, we identify future directions and opportunities for interdisciplinary research to optimize dog welfare. Prioritizing animal welfare in research and practice will be critical to assure the ongoing relationship between dogs and people as co-workers.

Keywords: animal welfare; dogs; human-animal interaction; science; sustainability; working dogs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Broom DM. Animal welfare: an aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. J Vet Med Educ. (2010) 37:83–8. 10.3138/jvme.37.1.83 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coleman G. Public animal welfare discussions and outlooks in Australia. Anim Front. (2018) 8:14. 10.1093/af/vfx004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnott ER, Early JB, Wade CM, McGreevy PD. Estimating the economic value of Australian stock herding dogs. Anim Welfare. (2014) 23:189–97. 10.7120/09627286.23.2.189 - DOI
    1. Wirth KE, Rein DB. The economic costs and benefits of dog guides for the blind. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. (2008) 15:92–8. 10.1080/09286580801939353 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Browne C, Stafford K, Fordham R. The use of scent-detection dogs. Ir Vet J. (2006) 59:97–104.