Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan;92(1-2):57-61.
doi: 10.1111/ans.17340. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

Clearing the air on surgical plume

Affiliations
Review

Clearing the air on surgical plume

David A Watters et al. ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Surgical smoke or plume is produced by a variety of surgical coagulators and dissectors. A number of jurisdictions have recently introduced policies to reduce the associated occupational health risks including WorkSafe Victoria and New South Wales Health.

Method: This paper is a narrative review of potential risks, including any associated with COVID-19, and options for mitigation.

Results: Surgical smoke or plume contains potentially toxic chemicals, some of which are carcinogens. Plume may also contain live virus, notably Human Papilloma and Hepatitis B, though any possible viral transmission is limited to a few case reports. Despite identifying COVID-19 ribonucleic acid fragments in various body tissues and fluids there are no current reports of COVID-19 transmission. Although plume is rapidly removed from the atmosphere in modern operating rooms, it is still inhaled by the operative team. Mitigation should include ensuring diathermy devices have evacuators while plume extraction should be standard for laparoscopic procedures. Consideration needs to be given to the potential to compromise the operating field of view, or the noise of the extractor impairing communication. There is an increasing range of suitable products on the market. The future includes pendant systems built into the operating room.

Conclusion: The potential risks associated with surgical plume cannot be ignored. Health services should invest in plume extraction devices with a view to protecting their staff. The conduct of the operation should not be compromised by the devices chosen. Future operating theatres need to be designed to minimize exposure to plume.

Keywords: COVID-19; electrocautery; occupational health; operating theatres; surgical plume.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Work Safe Victoria. Managing surgical plume exposure in healthcare. Work Safe Victoria 22/6/21 [Cited 25 Jun 2021.] Available from URL: https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/managing-surgical-plume-exposure-healthcare.
    1. New South Wales Health. Work Health and Safety - Controlling Exposure to Surgical Plume. 19th January 2015 [Cited 11 Aug 2021.] Available from URL: https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/GL2015_002.pdf
    1. Australian College of Perioperative Nurses. Standards for Perioperative Nurses in Australia, 16th edn. Surgical Plume. South Australia: ACORN, 2020.
    1. Beswick A, Evans G. Evidence for exposure and harmful effects of diathermy plumes (surgical smoke) Evidence based literature review. Health and Safety Laboratory published by Health and Safety Executive, 2012 https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr922.pdf .
    1. Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP. Electrosurgery: history, principles and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 520-3.

LinkOut - more resources