Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):197-206.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab228.

A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research

Betina Idnay  1   2 , Caitlin Dreisbach  3 , Chunhua Weng  4 , Rebecca Schnall  1
Affiliations

A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research

Betina Idnay et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect of natural language processing (NLP) systems in improving the accuracy and efficiency of eligibility prescreening during the clinical research recruitment process.

Materials and methods: Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards of quality for reporting systematic reviews, a protocol for study eligibility was developed a priori and registered in the PROSPERO database. Using predetermined inclusion criteria, studies published from database inception through February 2021 were identified from 5 databases. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-experimental Studies was adapted to determine the study quality and the risk of bias of the included articles.

Results: Eleven studies representing 8 unique NLP systems met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated moderate study quality and exhibited heterogeneity in the study design, setting, and intervention type. All 11 studies evaluated the NLP system's performance for identifying eligible participants; 7 studies evaluated the system's impact on time efficiency; 4 studies evaluated the system's impact on workload; and 2 studies evaluated the system's impact on recruitment.

Discussion: NLP systems in clinical research eligibility prescreening are an understudied but promising field that requires further research to assess its impact on real-world adoption. Future studies should be centered on continuing to develop and evaluate relevant NLP systems to improve enrollment into clinical studies.

Conclusion: Understanding the role of NLP systems in improving eligibility prescreening is critical to the advancement of clinical research recruitment.

Keywords: clinical research; clinical trial matching; cohort identification; eligibility prescreening; natural language processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart for literature search. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lenfant C. Clinical research to clinical practice—lost in translation? N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (9): 868–74. - PubMed
    1. Carlisle B, Kimmelman J, Ramsay T, et al. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials. Clin Trials 2015; 12 (1): 77–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19 (1–2): 227–33. - PubMed
    1. Lamberti MJ, Mathias A, Myles JE, et al. Evaluating the impact of patient recruitment and retention practices. Drug Inf J 2012; 46 (5): 573–80.
    1. Penberthy LT, Dahman BA, Petkov VI, et al. Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials. J Oncol Pract 2012; 8 (6): 365–70. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types