Anterior versus posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
- PMID: 34725791
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00436-x
Anterior versus posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Anterior versus posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Spine Deform. 2022 Mar;10(2):283. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00447-8. Spine Deform. 2022. PMID: 34841482 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: To review and compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. All level I-III evidence studies investigating the clinical and radiologic outcomes of ASF and PSF for the treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS were included.
Results: Nine studies (285 ASF patients, 298 PSF patients) were included. ASF was associated with a significantly lower number of levels fused compared with PSF (p < 0.01) with similar immediate and long-term coronal deformity correction (p = 0.16; p = 0.12, respectively). PSF achieved a better correction of thoracic hypokyphosis in one study and lumbar hypolordosis in three studies. PSF was associated with a significant shorter length of stay (LOS) compared with ASF (p < 0.01). One long-term study demonstrated a significantly higher rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) with PSF compared with ASF. There were no significant differences in major complication or re-operation rates.
Conclusion: For the treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS, there is moderate evidence to suggest that ASF requires a lower number of instrumented levels to achieve similar immediate and long-term coronal deformity correction compared with PSF. There is some evidence to suggest that PSF may achieve better thoracic and lumbar sagittal deformity correction compared with ASF. There is some evidence to suggest a higher incidence of PJK at long-term follow-up with PSF compared with ASF. ASF is associated with a longer post-operative LOS compared with PSF.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Anterior fusion; Lenke 5; Posterior fusion.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS et al (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1302–1313 - DOI
-
- Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(8):1169–1181 - DOI
-
- Sun X, Qiu Y, Liu Z et al (2009) Interbody cage support improves reconstruction of sagittal balance after anterior selective fusion in Lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis patients. Orthop Surg 1:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2009.00051.x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Sun Z, Qiu G, Zhao Y et al (2014) Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1? Eur Spine J 23:1251–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3276-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Senkoylu A, Luk KD, Wong YW et al (2014) Prognosis of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after the selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5C) curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 14:1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.467 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical