Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e022635.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022635. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

Immigration Status and Sex Differences in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Retrospective Study of 5 Million Adults

Affiliations

Immigration Status and Sex Differences in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Retrospective Study of 5 Million Adults

Manav V Vyas et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background We evaluated whether immigration status modified the association between sex and the quality of primary cardiovascular disease prevention in Ontario, Canada. Methods and Results We used a population-based administrative database-derived cohort of community-dwelling adults (aged ≥40 years) without prior cardiovascular disease residing in Ontario on January 1, 2011. In the preceding 3 years, we evaluated screening for hyperlipidemia and diabetes in those not previously diagnosed; diabetes control (HbA1c <7%); and medication use to control hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes in those with previous diagnosis. We calculated the absolute prevalence difference (APD) between women and men for each metric stratified by immigration status and then determined the difference-in-differences for immigrants compared with long-term residents. Our sample included 5.3 million adults (19% immigrants), with receipt of each metric ranging from 55% to 90%. Among immigrants, women were more likely than men to be screened for hyperlipidemia (APD, 10.8%; 95% CI, 10.5-11.2) and diabetes (APD, 11.5%; 95% CI, 11.1-11.8) and to be treated with medications for hypertension (APD, 3.5%; 95% CI, 2.4-4.5), diabetes (APD, 2.1%; 95% CI, 0.7-3.6) and hyperlipidemia (APD, 1.8%; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1). Among long-term residents, findings were similar except poorer medication use for diabetes (APD, -2.8%; 95% CI, -3.4 to -2.2) and hyperlipidemia (APD, -3.5%; 95% CI, -4.0 to -3.0]) in women compared with men. Conclusions The overall quality of primary preventive care can be improved for all adults, and future research should evaluate the impact of observed equal or better care in women than men, irrespective of immigration status, on cardiovascular disease incidence.

Keywords: cardiovascular; immigration; prevention; quality; sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sex differences in cardiovascular preventive care comparing women with men among immigrants and long‐term residents, and the difference‐in‐difference estimates comparing sex differences among immigrants and long‐term residents.
*In people aged >64 years with a relevant diagnosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Primary cardiovascular preventive care in immigrant women compared with men based on region of origin of immigrants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tu JV, Chu A, Rezai MR, Guo H, Maclagan LC, Austin PC, Booth GL, Manuel DG, Chiu M, Ko DT, et al. The incidence of major cardiovascular events in immigrants to Ontario, Canada: the CANHEART immigrant study. Circulation. 2015;132:1549–1559. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015345 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. St‐Pierre M, Sinclair I, Elgbeili G, Bernard P, Dancause KN. Relationships between psychological distress and health behaviors among Canadian adults: differences based on gender, income, education, immigrant status, and ethnicity. SSM Popul Health. 2019;7:100385. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100385 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho L, Davis M, Elgendy I, Epps K, Lindley KJ, Mehta PK, Michos ED, Minissian M, Pepine C, Vaccarino V, et al. Summary of updated recommendations for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women: JACC state‐of‐the‐art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2602–2618. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.060 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Neil A, Scovelle AJ, Milner AJ, Kavanagh A. Gender/sex as a social determinant of cardiovascular risk. Circulation. 2018;137:854–864. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028595 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tu JV, Chu A, Donovan LR, Ko DT, Booth GL, Tu K, Maclagan LC, Guo H, Austin PC, Hogg W, et al. The Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team (CANHEART). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8:204–212. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001416 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types