Usability-In-Place-Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
- PMID: 34726604
- PMCID: PMC8596282
- DOI: 10.2196/26181
Usability-In-Place-Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
Abstract
Background: Technology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand the remote use of technology in an ecologically valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely.
Objective: Our objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly remote usability testing with older adults.
Methods: We performed a rapid review of the literature and reported on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reported recommendations for usability testing with older adults from the literature.
Results: Critically, we identified a gap in the literature-a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, and strategies for older adults, despite this population's increased remote technology use and needs (eg, due to disability or technology experience). We summarized existing remote usability methods that were found in the literature as well as guidelines that are available for conducting in-person usability testing with older adults.
Conclusions: We call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap to better support older adults and other homebound or mobility-restricted individuals.
Keywords: aging; elderly; literature synthesis; methods; mobile usability; mobile usability testing; mobility restriction; older adults; remote usability; usability inspection; usability study.
©Jordan R Hill, Janetta C Brown, Noll L Campbell, Richard J Holden. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 02.11.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Ornstein KA, Leff B, Covinsky KE, Ritchie CS, Federman AD, Roberts L, Kelley AS, Siu AL, Szanton SL. Epidemiology of the homebound population in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1180–1186. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1849. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26010119 2296016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- COVID-19 risks and vaccine information for older adults. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2020-08-27]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/older-a... .
-
- Cudjoe TKM, Kotwal AA. "Social Distancing" amid a crisis in social isolation and loneliness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):E27–E29. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16527. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32359072 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Anderson M, Perrin A. Technology use among seniors. Pew Research Center. 2017. May 17, [2020-11-24]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/technology-use-among-sen...
-
- Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, Phinney D, Curtis S, Roman M, Poon EG, Ferranti J, Katz JN, Tcheng J. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 01;27(6):957–962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32311034 5822868 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
