Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 Jan 12;42(2):NP137-NP139.
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab383.

Rethinking Reconstruction: Ethical Standards and Practice Guidelines as a Prerequisite to Clitoral Reconstruction Following Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Affiliations
Comment

Rethinking Reconstruction: Ethical Standards and Practice Guidelines as a Prerequisite to Clitoral Reconstruction Following Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Jasmine Abdulcadir et al. Aesthet Surg J. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Wilson AM, Zaki AA. Novel clitoral reconstruction and coverage with sensate labial flaps: potential remedy for female genital mutilation. Aesthet Surg J. 2021. Doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab218. [Epub ahead of print]. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O‘Dey DM. Complex reconstruction of the vulva following female genital mutilation/cutting. Der Urologe. 2022;42(2):183–192.
    1. Auricchio V, Garzon S, Pomini P, et al. . Clitoral reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a systematic review. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021;29:100619. - PubMed
    1. Kreklau A, Vâz I, Oehme F, et al. . Measurements of a ‘normal vulva’ in women aged 15-84: a cross-sectional prospective single-centre study. BJOG. 2018;125(13):1656-1661. - PubMed
    1. Foldès P, Cuzin B, Andro A. Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):134-141. - PubMed