Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;52(4):640-650.
doi: 10.1111/imj.15603. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

Clinical relevance of shear wave elastography compared with transient elastography and other markers of liver fibrosis

Affiliations

Clinical relevance of shear wave elastography compared with transient elastography and other markers of liver fibrosis

Oyekoya T Ayonrinde et al. Intern Med J. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Early and accurate non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is important for reducing the burden of cirrhosis and related complications.

Aim: This cross-sectional study compares shear wave elastography (SWE), transient elastography (TE) and clinical markers of chronic liver disease in patients with various liver disorders.

Methods: Liver ultrasound with SWE was performed on 421 adult patients, 227 of whom also had TE. Patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), liver disease aetiology and laboratory results were recorded. Associations between SWE, TE and other tests for liver fibrosis and chronic liver disease severity were sought. Advanced liver fibrosis was defined as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) equivalent to ≥F3 using Metavir staging.

Results: Patients were predominantly male (68%), with mean (standard deviation) age 54 (13) years, BMI 28 (6) kg/m2 and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 39 (27) U/L. Liver disorders were predominantly non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), chronic hepatitis B (CHB), chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and alcohol-related liver disease. The median (interquartile range) LSM was 10 (6-20) kPa with SWE and 9.2 (6-21) kPa with TE. Advanced liver fibrosis was associated with older age, higher BMI, model for end-stage liver disease score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), AST/ALT ratio, AST to platelet ratio index, fibrosis-4 index and Hepascore. SWE and TE LSM were positively correlated, particularly for NAFLD and CHC. SWE LSM predicted ultrasound and endoscopy-diagnosed portal hypertension and oesophageal varices.

Conclusions: Across various liver diseases, SWE is at least comparable with TE and other non-invasive tests of liver fibrosis. SWE is accurate for predicting liver-related portal hypertension.

Keywords: chronic liver disease; elastography; endoscopy; liver fibrosis; portal hypertension; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between shear wave elastography (SWE) liver stiffness measurement and age, body mass index (BMI) and other risk factors for liver fibrosis. Error bars represent the means and standard deviations. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APRI, AST to platelet ratio index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; FIB‐4, fibrosis‐4 index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlations between shear wave elastography and transient elastography liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in different liver disorders: alcohol (r = 0.53, P = 0.03); non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (r = 0.87, P < 0.001); hepatitis C virus (HCV) (r = 0.76, P < 0.001); hepatitis B virus (HBV) (r = 0.50, P < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic ability of various tests for (A) transient elastography (TE) significant fibrosis (≥F2); (B) TE advanced liver fibrosis (≥F3); (C) TE‐diagnosed cirrhosis (F4). Tables display area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P‐values compare shear wave elastography (SWE) AUROC with AUROC for Hepascore, fibrosis‐4 index (FIB‐4), AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) ratio.

References

    1. GBD 2017 Cirrhosis Collaborators . The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990‐2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5: 245–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol 2019; 70: 151–71. - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease – a global public health perspective. J Hepatol 2019; 70: 531–44. - PubMed
    1. Wang FS, Fan JG, Zhang Z, Gao B, Wang HY. The global burden of liver disease: the major impact of China. Hepatology 2014; 60: 2099–108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marcellin P, Kutala BK. Liver diseases: a major, neglected global public health problem requiring urgent actions and large‐scale screening. Liver Int 2018; 38(Suppl 1): 2–6. - PubMed