This is a preprint.
Quarantine and testing strategies to ameliorate transmission due to travel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modelling study
- PMID: 34729563
- PMCID: PMC8562544
- DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.25.21256082
Quarantine and testing strategies to ameliorate transmission due to travel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modelling study
Update in
-
Quarantine and testing strategies to ameliorate transmission due to travel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modelling study.Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Mar;14:100304. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100304. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022. PMID: 35036981 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Numerous countries imposed strict travel restrictions, contributing to the large socioeconomic burden during the COVID-19 pandemic. The long quarantines that apply to contacts of cases may be excessive for travel policy.
Methods: We developed an approach to evaluate imminent countrywide COVID-19 infections after 0-14-day quarantine and testing. We identified the minimum travel quarantine duration such that the infection rate within the destination country did not increase compared to a travel ban, defining this minimum quarantine as "sufficient."
Findings: We present a generalised analytical framework and a specific case study of the epidemic situation on November 21, 2021, for application to 26 European countries. For most origin-destination country pairs, a three-day or shorter quarantine with RT-PCR or antigen testing on exit suffices. Adaptation to the European Union traffic-light risk stratification provided a simplified policy tool. Our analytical approach provides guidance for travel policy during all phases of pandemic diseases.
Interpretation: For nearly half of origin-destination country pairs analysed, travel can be permitted in the absence of quarantine and testing. For the majority of pairs requiring controls, a short quarantine with testing could be as effective as a complete travel ban. The estimated travel quarantine durations are substantially shorter than those specified for traced contacts.
Funding: EasyJet (JPT and APG), the Elihu endowment (JPT), the Burnett and Stender families' endowment (APG), the Notsew Orm Sands Foundation (JPT and APG), the National Institutes of Health (MCF), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (SMM) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada EIDM-MfPH (SMM).
Keywords: RT-PCR test; SARS CoV-2; antigen test; tourism; travel quarantine.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: JPT and APG declare the following competing interests: received funding from EasyJet to conduct research on travel quarantine durations. CRW, AP, WSC, MCF, BHS, and SMM declare no competing interest. The funders had no role in designing the study, conducting the analyses, deriving the findings, or the decision to publish the outcomes.
Figures
References
-
- Mallapaty S. What the data say about border closures and COVID spread. Nature 2021; 589: 185. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous