Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Nov 2;45(12):105.
doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01783-y.

Machine Learning for Health: Algorithm Auditing & Quality Control

Affiliations
Editorial

Machine Learning for Health: Algorithm Auditing & Quality Control

Luis Oala et al. J Med Syst. .

Abstract

Developers proposing new machine learning for health (ML4H) tools often pledge to match or even surpass the performance of existing tools, yet the reality is usually more complicated. Reliable deployment of ML4H to the real world is challenging as examples from diabetic retinopathy or Covid-19 screening show. We envision an integrated framework of algorithm auditing and quality control that provides a path towards the effective and reliable application of ML systems in healthcare. In this editorial, we give a summary of ongoing work towards that vision and announce a call for participation to the special issue Machine Learning for Health: Algorithm Auditing & Quality Control in this journal to advance the practice of ML4H auditing.

Keywords: Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Auditing; Health; Machine learning; Quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process overview. A: Most ML tools share a set of core components comprising data, a ML-model and its outputs B: The typical ML life cycle goes through stages of planning, development, validation and, potentially, deployment under appropriate monitoring C: An ML4H audit is carried out with respect to a dynamic set of technical, clinical and regulatory considerations that depend on the concrete ML technology and the intended use of the tool

References

    1. Hägele M, Seegerer P, Lapuschkin S, Bockmayr M, Samek W, Klauschen F, Müller K-R, Binder A. Resolving challenges in deep learning-based analyses of histopathological images using explanation methods. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62724-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M. M. R., Tajbakhsh, N., and Liang, J. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support. Springer, 2018, pp. 3–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bubba TA, Kutyniok G, Lassas M, März M, Samek W, Siltanen S, Srinivasan V. Learning the invisible: a hybrid deep learning-shearlet framework for limited angle computed tomography. Inverse Problems. 2019;35(6):064002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab10ca. - DOI
    1. Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, Kirkpatrick J, Sifre L, Green T, Qin C, Žídek A, Nelson AW, Bridgland A, et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature. 2020;577(7792):706–710. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner P, Strodthoff N, Bousseljot R-D, Kreiseler D, Lunze FI, Samek W, Schaeffter T. Ptb-xl, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset. Scientific Data. 2020;7(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0495-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources