Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;35(2):471-479.
doi: 10.1111/jar.12952. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Straight from the horse's mouth: Increasing self-report in mental health assessment in individuals with intellectual disability

Susan M Havercamp  1 , L Jarrett Barnhill  2 , Alexandra Bonardi  3 , Richard A Chapman  4 , Chelsea Cobranchi  1 , Robert J Fletcher  5 , Paula Rabidoux  1 , John R Seeley  6 , Marc J Tassé  7 ; Nisonger Center RRTC on Health and Function
Affiliations
Review

Straight from the horse's mouth: Increasing self-report in mental health assessment in individuals with intellectual disability

Susan M Havercamp et al. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Mental health conditions are common among individuals with intellectual disability. Under recognition of mental health disorders leading to unmet treatment needs is common in this population. This article addresses one major contributing factor, the lack of cognitively accessible self-report measures for individuals with intellectual disability.

Method: In this literature-informed overview of the state of the field, we discuss the need for, and complexities of, including individuals with intellectual disability in mental health assessments.

Results: With appropriate supports, many individuals with intellectual disability can respond to mental health questions. We discuss evidence-based strategies to make mental health assessments more accessible.

Conclusion: We highlight the need to engage individuals with intellectual disability to provide first-hand information about their health and well-being. New instruments and research procedures should be developed in partnership with individuals with intellectual disability. Self-report may be essential to advancing the science of mental health research.

Keywords: cognitive accessibility; intellectual disability; mental health; proxy-report; self-report.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Argus, G. R., Terry, P. C., Bramston, P., & Dinsdale, S. L. (2004). Measurement of mood in adolescents with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25(6), 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.05.001
    1. Barlow, J., & Kirby, N. (1991). Residential satisfaction of persons with an intellectual disability living in an institution or in the community. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07263869100034231
    1. Barnett, J. (1998). Sensitive questions and response effects: an evaluation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(1/2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949810369138
    1. Belva, B. C., Matson, J. L., Sipes, M., & Bamburg, J. W. (2012). An examination of specific communication deficits in adults with profound intellectual disabilities. Research in Develop- mental Disabilities, 33, 525-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.019
    1. Binger, C., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication. In M. L. Wehmeyer, I. Brown, M. Percy, K. A. Shogren, & W. L. A. Fung (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 461-471). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

LinkOut - more resources