From a case-control survey to a diagnostic viral gastroenteritis panel for testing of general practitioners' patients
- PMID: 34731182
- PMCID: PMC8565752
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258680
From a case-control survey to a diagnostic viral gastroenteritis panel for testing of general practitioners' patients
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the pathogenicity of a broad range of 11 possible gastroenteritis viruses, by means of statistical relationships with cases vs. controls, or Ct-values, in order to establish the most appropriate diagnostic panel for our general practitioner (GP) patients in the Netherlands (2010-2012).
Methods: Archived stool samples from 1340 cases and 1100 controls were retested using internally controlled multiplex real-time PCRs for putative pathogenic gastroenteritis viruses: adenovirus, astrovirus, bocavirus, enterovirus, norovirus GI and GII, human parechovirus, rotavirus, salivirus, sapovirus, and torovirus.
Results: The prevalence of any virus in symptomatic cases and asymptomatic controls was 16.6% (223/1340) and 10.2% (112/1100), respectively. Prevalence of astrovirus (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 10.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-80.06) and norovirus GII (aOR 3.10; CI 1.62-5.92) was significantly higher in cases versus controls. Rotavirus was encountered only in cases. We did not find torovirus and there was no statistically significant relationship with cases for salivirus (aOR 1,67; (CI) 0.43-6.54)), adenovirus non-group F (aOR 1.20; CI 0.75-1.91), bocavirus (aOR 0.85; CI 0.05-13.64), enterovirus (aOR 0.83; CI 0.50-1.37), human parechovirus (aOR 1.61; CI 0.54-4.77) and sapovirus (aOR 1.15; CI 0.67-1.98). Though adenovirus group F (aOR 6.37; CI 0.80-50.92) and norovirus GI (aOR 2.22, CI: 0.79-6.23) are known enteropathogenic viruses and were more prevalent in cases than in controls, this did not reach significance in this study. The Ct value did not discriminate between carriage and disease in PCR-positive subjects.
Conclusions: In our population, diagnostic gastroenteritis tests should screen for adenovirus group F, astrovirus, noroviruses GI and GII, and rotavirus. Case-control studies as ours are lacking and should also be carried out in populations from other epidemiological backgrounds.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Loogman MC, Bouma M, Burgers JS. [Practice guideline on ’Acute diarrhoea’ from the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A8659. Epub 2015/02/19. . - PubMed
-
- Larocque RCH J.B. Syndromes of enteric infection. In: Bennett JCD R.; Blaser M.J., editor. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 1330–9.
-
- Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LE, Dullaert-de Boer M, Ruijs GJ, van der Reijden WA, van der Zanden AG, Weel JF, et al.. Case-control comparison of bacterial and protozoan microorganisms associated with gastroenteritis: application of molecular detection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(6):592 e9-19. Epub 2015/02/24. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.007 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Boer MD, Schuurs TA, Vermeer M, Ruijs G, van der Zanden AGM, Weel JF, et al.. Distribution and relevance of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis species in gastroenteritis: results from a case-control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(1):197–203. Epub 2019/10/30. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03710-z . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
