Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 3;16(11):e0259510.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259510. eCollection 2021.

Latent class analysis of IPOs in the Nordics

Affiliations

Latent class analysis of IPOs in the Nordics

Mikael Bask et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

We examine how the offer size of initial public offerings (IPOs) and the market return on their issue date are related to the pricing of 314 IPOs issued by firms in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden at the one-day, one-week and four-week horizons using latent class analysis, which is a structural equation methodology. We identify four latent classes at each time horizon, where classes (i)-(ii) include a greater number of IPOs: (i) large-sized and underpriced IPOs; (ii) small-sized and overpriced IPOs; (iii) small-sized and severely underpriced IPOs; and (iv) large-sized IPOs that are overpriced at the one-day horizon but underpriced at the four-week horizon. The market returns are normal in latent classes (i)-(iii) and weak in class (iv). Approximately half of the IPOs in the technology sector are in the latent class with small-sized and overpriced IPOs, and most of the IPOs in the class with small-sized and severely underpriced IPOs are in the healthcare sector. Finally, the underpricing of IPOs is not corrected after one or four weeks of trading. Instead, the mean return and the standard deviation of returns increase with the time horizon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Lowry M, Officer MS, Schwert GW. The variability of IPO initial returns. J Finance. 2010; 65: 425–465.
    1. Loughran T, Ritter J, Rydqvist K. Initial public offerings: International insights. Available from: https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/International.pdf
    1. Ljungqvist A. IPO underpricing. In: Eckbo BE, editor. Handbook of empirical corporate finance, volume 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland; 2007. Chapter 7.
    1. Schultz P. Pseudo market timing and the long-run underperformance of IPOs. J Finance. 2003; 58: 483–517.
    1. Hahl T, Vähämaa S, Äijö J. Value versus growth in IPOs: New evidence from Finland. Res Int Bus Finance. 2014; 31: 17–31.