Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):1067-1075.
doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00050. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Adoption by Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study

Jacqueline M Weycker  1   2 , Lauren K Dillard  1   2 , Alex Pinto  3 , Mary E Fischer  3 , Karen J Cruickshanks  1   3 , Ted S Tweed  2   3
Affiliations

Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Adoption by Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study

Jacqueline M Weycker et al. Am J Audiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Hearing loss (HL) is common among middle-age and older adults, but hearing aid adoption is low. The purpose of this study was to measure the 10-year incidence of hearing aid adoption in a sample of primarily middle-age adults with high-frequency HL and identify factors associated with hearing aid adoption.

Method: This study included 579 adults (ages 34-80 years) with high-frequency pure-tone average > 25 dB HL (3-8 kHz) enrolled in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. Hearing aid adoption was measured at 5- and 10-year follow-up examinations. Cox discrete-time proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors associated with hearing aid adoption (presented as hazards ratios [HRs] and 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]).

Results: The 10-year cumulative incidence of hearing aid adoption was 14 per 1,000 person years. Factors significantly associated with adoption in a multivariable model were higher education (vs. 16+ years; 0-12: HR: 0.36, 95% CI [0.19, 0.69]; 13-15: HR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.27, 0.98]), worse high-frequency pure-tone average (per +1 dB; HR: 1.04, 95% CI [1.02, 1.06]), self-reported hearing handicap (screening versions of the Hearing Handicap Inventory score > 8; HR: 1.85, 95% CI [1.02, 3.38]), answering yes to "Do friends and relatives think you have a hearing problem?" (HR: 3.18, 95% CI [1.60, 6.33]) and using closed captions (HR: 2.86, 95% CI [1.08, 7.57]). Effects of age and sex were not significant.

Conclusions: Hearing aid adoption rates were low. Hearing sensitivity, socioeconomic status, and measures of the impact of HL on daily life were associated with adoption. Provider awareness of associated factors can contribute to timely and appropriate intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American National Standards Institute. (1999). Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms (ANSI S3.1e1999). Author.
    1. American National Standards Institute. (2010). Specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6e2010). Author.
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry [Guidelines] . http://www.asha.org/policy
    1. Bainbridge, K. E. , & Ramachandran, V. (2014). Hearing aid use among older U.S. adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2006 and 2009–2010. Ear and Hearing, 35(3), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000441036.40169.29 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beamer, S. , Grant, K. , & Walden, B. (2000). Hearing aid benefit in patients with high-frequency hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11(8), 429–437. https://www.audiology.org/sites/default/files/journal/JAAA_11_08_03.pdf - PubMed