Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 18:15:764520.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.764520. eCollection 2021.

Sex Differences in Odor Hedonic Perception: An Overview

Affiliations
Review

Sex Differences in Odor Hedonic Perception: An Overview

Charlotte Bontempi et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Odor hedonic evaluation (pleasant/unpleasant) is considered as the first and one of the most prominent dimension in odor perception. While sex differences in human olfaction have been extensively explored, gender effect in hedonic perception appears to be less considered. However, a number of studies have included comparisons between men and women, using different types of measurements (psychophysical, psychophysiological,…). This overview presents experimental works with non-specific and body odors separately presented as well as experimental studies comparing healthy participants vs patients with psychiatric disorders. Contrary to sensitivity, identification or discrimination, the overall literature tends to prove that no so clear differences occur in odor hedonic judgment between men and women. On the whole, gender effect appears more marked for body than non-specific odors and is almost never reported in psychiatric diseases. These findings are discussed in relation to the processes classically implied in pleasantness rating and emotional processes.

Keywords: emotion; hedonicity; olfaction; pleasantness rating; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Alaoui-Ismaïli O., Robin O., Rada H., Dittmar A., Vernet-Maury E. (1997a). Basic emotions evoked by odorants: comparison between autonomic responses and self-evaluation. Physiol. Behav. 62 713–720. 10.1016/S0031-9384(97)90016-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alaoui-Ismaïli O., Vernet-Maury E., Dittmar A., Delhomme G., Chanel J. (1997b). Odor hedonics: connection with emotional responses estimated by autonomic parameters. Chem. Senses. 22 237–248. 10.1093/chemse/22.3.237 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atanasova B., El-Hage W., Chabanet C., Gaillard P., Belzung C., Camus V. (2010). Olfactory anhedonia and negative olfactory alliesthesia in depressed patients. Psychiatry Res. 176 190–196. 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.11.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atanasova B., Graux J., El Hage W., Hommet C., Camus V., Belzung C. (2008). Olfaction: a potential cognitive marker of psychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32 1315–1325. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachorowski J., Owren M. J. (2003). Sounds of emotion production and perception of affect-related vocal acoustics. Ann. N.Y.Acad. Sci. 1000 244–265. 10.1196/annals.1280.012 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources