Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;36(1):833-843.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08798-z. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Augmented reality in laparoscopic liver resection evaluated on an ex-vivo animal model with pseudo-tumours

Affiliations

Augmented reality in laparoscopic liver resection evaluated on an ex-vivo animal model with pseudo-tumours

Mourad Adballah et al. Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of our augmented reality (AR) software (Hepataug) during laparoscopic resection of liver tumours and compare it to standard ultrasonography (US).

Materials and methods: Ninety pseudo-tumours ranging from 10 to 20 mm were created in sheep cadaveric livers by injection of alginate. CT-scans were then performed and 3D models reconstructed using a medical image segmentation software (MITK). The livers were placed in a pelvi-trainer on an inclined plane, approximately perpendicular to the laparoscope. The aim was to obtain free resection margins, as close as possible to 1 cm. Laparoscopic resection was performed using US alone (n = 30, US group), AR alone (n = 30, AR group) and both US and AR (n = 30, ARUS group). R0 resection, maximal margins, minimal margins and mean margins were assessed after histopathologic examination, adjusted to the tumour depth and to a liver zone-wise difficulty level.

Results: The minimal margins were not different between the three groups (8.8, 8.0 and 6.9 mm in the US, AR and ARUS groups, respectively). The maximal margins were larger in the US group compared to the AR and ARUS groups after adjustment on depth and zone difficulty (21 vs. 18 mm, p = 0.001 and 21 vs. 19.5 mm, p = 0.037, respectively). The mean margins, which reflect the variability of the measurements, were larger in the US group than in the ARUS group after adjustment on depth and zone difficulty (15.2 vs. 12.8 mm, p < 0.001). When considering only the most difficult zone (difficulty 3), there were more R1/R2 resections in the US group than in the AR + ARUS group (50% vs. 21%, p = 0.019).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic liver resection using AR seems to provide more accurate resection margins with less variability than the gold standard US navigation, particularly in difficult to access liver zones with deep tumours.

Keywords: Augmented reality; Deformable 3D model; Laparoscopy; Liver; Overlay; Resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Slakey DP, Simms E, Drew B, Yazdi F, Roberts B (2013) Complications of liver resection: laparoscopic versus open procedures. JSLS 17:46–55. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317716 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Landi F, De Angelis N, Scatton O, Vidal X, Ayav A, Muscari F, Dokmak S, Torzilli G, Demartines N, Soubrane O, Cherqui D, Hardwigsen J, Laurent A (2017) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma: a multicenter propensity score adjustment analysis by the AFC-HCA-2013 study group. Surg Endosc 31:4136–4144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5466-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goumard C, Farges O, Laurent A, Cherqui D, Soubrane O, Gayet B, Pessaux P, Pruvot F-R, Scatton O, Associationfor Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, F (2015) An update on laparoscopic liver resection: The French hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery association statement. J Visc Surg 152:107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tønnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Røsok BI, Bjørnbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B (2018) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: The OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002353 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phutane P, Buc E, Poirot K, Ozgur E, Pezet D, Bartoli A, Le Roy B (2018) Preliminary trial of augmented reality performed on a laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 32:514–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5733-4 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources