Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;41(2):149-155.
doi: 10.1111/hir.12409. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

An alternative screening approach for Google Search identifies an accurate and manageable number of results for a systematic review (case study)

Simon Briscoe  1 , Morwenna Rogers  1
Affiliations

An alternative screening approach for Google Search identifies an accurate and manageable number of results for a systematic review (case study)

Simon Briscoe et al. Health Info Libr J. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Background: A challenge when using Google Search to identify studies for a systematic review is managing the high number of results, which can number in the hundreds of thousands or even more. Studies and guidance on web searching suggest limiting the screening process, e.g. to the first 100 results.

Objectives: Our objective in this case study is to demonstrate an alternative approach to screening the results retrieved by Google Search which is based on our experience that the viewable number of results is often far fewer than the estimated number calculated by the search engine.

Methods: We screened the results of three searches of Google Search using our approach, which involves increasing the number of results displayed per page from 10 to the maximum of 100. We then calculated the viewable number of results and compared this with the estimated number.

Results: The mean of the estimated number of results for the three searches was 569,454,000. The mean of the viewable number results was 463 (0.00008% of the mean of the estimated number of results).

Conclusion: Our findings challenge the commonly reported view that the number of results retrieved when using Google Search is too high to screen in full.

Keywords: World Wide Web (WWW); literature searching; review; review and systematic search; search strategies; supplementary searching; systematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Booth, A. (2010). How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 26(4), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462310000966
    1. Briscoe, S. (2016). Eysenbach, Tuische and Diepgen’s evaluation of web searching for identifying unpublished studies for systematic reviews: An innovative study which is still relevant today. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(3), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8F049
    1. Briscoe, S. (2021). Exploring the relevance of the effect of geographical location when searching for studies using Google Search. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(5), 572–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1510
    1. Briscoe, S., Nunns, M., & Shaw, L. (2020). How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross‐sectional sample of Cochrane reviews. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(4), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12313
    1. Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. (2013). Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. Retrieved from www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Guidelines/Guidelines4.2.pdf.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources