Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0258882.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258882. eCollection 2021.

Field testing two existing, standardized respiratory severity scores (LIBSS and ReSViNET) in infants presenting with acute respiratory illness to tertiary hospitals in Rwanda - a validation and inter-rater reliability study

Affiliations

Field testing two existing, standardized respiratory severity scores (LIBSS and ReSViNET) in infants presenting with acute respiratory illness to tertiary hospitals in Rwanda - a validation and inter-rater reliability study

Boniface Hakizimana et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: There is a substantial burden of respiratory disease in infants in the sub-Saharan Africa region. Many health care providers (HCPs) that initially receive infants with respiratory distress may not be adequately skilled to differentiate between mild, moderate and severe respiratory symptoms, which may contribute to poor management and outcome. Therefore, respiratory severity scores have the potential to contributing to address this gap.

Objectives: to field-test the use of two existing standardized bronchiolitis severity scores (LIBSS and ReSViNET) in a population of Rwandan infants (1-12 months) presenting with respiratory illnesses to urban, tertiary, pediatric hospitals and to assess the severity of respiratory distress in these infants and the treatments used.

Methods: A cross-sectional, validation study, was conducted in four tertiary hospitals in Rwanda. Infants presenting with difficulty in breathing were included. The LIBSS and ReSViNET scores were independently employed by nurses and residents to assess the severity of disease in each infant.

Results: 100 infants were recruited with a mean age of seven months. Infants presented with pneumonia (n = 51), bronchiolitis (n = 36) and other infectious respiratory illnesses (n = 13). Thirty-three infants had severe disease and survival was 94% using nurse applied LIBSS. Regarding inter-rater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for LIBSS and ReSViNET between nurses and residents was 0.985 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and 0.980 (0.97-0.99). The convergent validity (Pearson's correlation) between LIBSS and ReSViNET for nurses and residents was R = 0.836 (p<0.001) and R = 0.815 (p<0.001). The area under the Receiver Operator Curve (aROC) for admission to PICU or HDU was 0.956 (CI: 0.92-0.99, p<0.001) and 0.880 (CI: 0.80-0.96, p<0.001) for nurse completed LIBSS and ReSViNET respectively.

Conclusion: LIBSS and ReSViNET were designed for infants with bronchiolitis in resource-rich settings. Both LIBSS and ReSViNET demonstrated good reliability and validity results, in this cohort of patients presenting to tertiary level hospitals. This early data demonstrate that these two scores have the potential to be used in conjunction with clinical reasoning to identify infants at increased risk of clinical deterioration and allow timely admission, treatment escalation and therefore support resource allocation in Rwanda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. CONSORT diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Convergent validity.
footnote: R = Pearson’s coefficient, ICC = Intra-class correlation.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Criterion validity (aROC) of nurse (green) and resident (blue) performed LIBSS and ReSVinet.
footnote: aROC = area under Receiver Operating Characteristic.

References

    1. Øymar K, Skjerven HO, Mikalsen IB. Acute bronchiolitis in infants, a review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. BioMed Central; 2014;22: 23. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudan I, Boschi-pinto C, Biloglav Z, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86: 408–415. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.048769 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown J, Machen H, Kawaza K, Mwanza Z, Iniguez S, Lang H, et al. A High-Value, Low-Cost Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure System for Low-Resource Settings: Technical Assessment and Initial Case Reports. PLoS One. 2013;8: 6–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053622 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh V. The burden of pneumonia in children: An Asian perspective. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2005;6: 88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2005.03.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO;UNICEF. Pneumonia: The forgotten killer of children [Internet]. 2006. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43640/9280640489_eng.pd...

MeSH terms