Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259398.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259398. eCollection 2021.

The use of DIY (Do it yourself) sampling and telemonitoring model for COVID-19 qPCR testing scale up

Affiliations

The use of DIY (Do it yourself) sampling and telemonitoring model for COVID-19 qPCR testing scale up

Olufemi Samuel Amoo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The first case of COVID-19 in Nigeria was recorded on February 27, 2020, being an imported case by an Italian expatriate, to the country. Since then, there has been steady increase in the number of cases. However, the number of cases in Nigeria is low in comparison to cases reported by other countries with similar large populations, despite the poor health system prevailing in the country. This has been mainly attributed to the low testing capacity in Nigeria among other factors. Therefore, there is a need for innovative ways to increase the number of persons testing for COVID-19. The aim of the study was to pilot a nasopharyngeal swab self-sample collection model that would help increase COVID-19 testing while ensuring minimal person-to-person contact being experienced at the testing center. 216 participants took part in this study which was carried out at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research between June and July 2020. Amongst the 216 participants, 174 tested negatives for both self-collected samples and samples collected by Professionals, 30 tested positive for both arms, with discrepancies occurring in 6 samples where the self-collected samples were positive while the ones collected by the professionals were negative. The same occurred in another set of 6 samples with the self-collected samples being negative and the professional-collected sample coming out positive, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 96.7%. The results of the interrater analysis are Kappa = 0.800 (95% CI, 0.690 to 0.910) which implies an outstanding agreement between the two COVID-19 sampling methods. Furthermore, since p< 0.001 Kappa (k) coefficient is statistically different from zero, our findings have shown that self-collected samples can be reliable in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Respondent’s age distribution.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Respondents exposure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fehr AR, & Perlman S. Coronaviruses: An Overview of Their Replication and Pathogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2015; 1–23. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2438-7_1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groneberg DA, Hilgenfeld R, Zabel P. Molecular mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Respir Res. 2005;6, 8. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiss SR, & Navas-Martin S. 2005. Coronavirus pathogenesis and the emerging pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews. 2005; 69(4), 635–664. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.4.635-664.2005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prajapat M, Sarma P, Shekhar N, Avti P, Sinha S, Kaur H, et al.. Drug targets for corona virus: A systematic review. Indian J Pharmacol 2005; 52:56–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bozorgmehr K., Saint V., Kaasch A., Stuckler D., & Kentikelenis A. COVID and the convergence of three crises in Europe. The Lancet Public Health. 2020. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30078-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms