Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jan:125:104100.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104100. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

Frank Kiwanuka  1 , Natalia Sak-Dankosky  2 , Yisak Hagos Alemayehu  3 , Rose Clarke Nanyonga  4 , Tarja Kvist  5
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

Frank Kiwanuka et al. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the consequences of a patient's admission to critical care settings, causing families to face more psychosocial issues than in previous years. Thus, nurses and other clinicians need to keep abreast of interventions that support the families of critical care patients.

Objective: To provide evidence of nurse-led family interventions and their family outcomes in adult critical care settings.

Design: A mixed method systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist.

Data sources: The search included both a screen of relevant databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library) and the screening of citations in relevant articles. Studies published in the English language between January 2010 and October 2020 were considered. The final database searches were performed on 20 October 2020.

Methods: Screening and eligibility assessment were conducted using the Rayyan software. Studies describing the family outcomes of nurse-led interventions in adult critical care settings through either qualitative or quantitative methods were included, i.e., the mixed method synthesis permitted the inclusion of either qualitative or quantitative findings. Article quality was evaluated by three authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools.

Findings: A total of 15 studies - two trials, eight quasi-experimental studies, four qualitative, and one mixed method met the inclusion criteria. The described interventions were organized into five categories: educational/informational; family involvement in care; diary; communication; and bundled interventions. These categories varied in terms of elements, delivery, and family outcomes. Nurse-led interventions that resulted in small to medium improvements in family outcomes included educational interventions with digital storytelling, a bundled approach, informational nursing interventions, and nurse-driven emotional support. The included studies (n = 2) that investigated family rounds in the ICU reported that this approach did not noticeably influence family outcomes.

Conclusion: The differences in the intervention elements, tools, and outcomes evaluated in this review reflect the diversity of family needs, and that numerous interventions have already been developed to promote family health in critical care settings. The evidence suggests that interdisciplinary nurse-led family interventions can improve family outcomes. Tweetable abstract: Interprofessional nurse-led family interventions draw on diverse approaches and improve family outcomes in adult critical care settings.

Keywords: Critical care; Family outcomes; Family-centered care; Mixed method; Nursing intervention; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram showing study selection.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Process for mixed method synthesis (Hardan, 2010).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alfheim H.B., Hofsø K., Småstuen M.C., Tøien K., Rosseland L.A., Rustøen T. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in family caregivers of intensive care unit patients: a longitudinal study. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 2019;50:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Mutair A.S., Plummer V., Clerehan R., O'Brien A. Needs and experiences of intensive care patients’ families: a Saudi qualitative study. Nurs. Crit. Care. 2014;19(3):135–144. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azoulay É., Curtis J.R., Kentish-Barnes N. Ten reasons for focusing on the care we provide for family members of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(2):230–233. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06319-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop S.M., Walker M.D., Spivak I.M. Family presence in the adult burn intensive care unit during dressing changes. Crit. Care Nurse. 2013;33(1):14–24. doi: 10.4037/ccn2013116. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, NJ: 1998. Statistical Power Analysis For the Behavioral Sciences.