Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 4;10(1):156.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3.

The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review

Affiliations

The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review

Oyungerel Byambasuren et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library for clinical trials and comparative observational studies in CENTRAL, and Europe PMC for pre-prints. We included studies that reported sufficient data to estimate the effect of any form of eye protection including face shields and variants, goggles, and glasses, on subsequent confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Results: We screened 898 articles and included 6 reports of 5 observational studies from 4 countries (USA, India, Columbia, and United Kingdom) that tested face shields, goggles, and wraparound eyewear on 7567 healthcare workers. The three before-and-after and one retrospective cohort studies showed statistically significant and substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections favouring eye protection with odds ratios ranging from 0.04 to 0.6, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 96% to 40%. These reductions were not explained by changes in the community rates. However, the one case-control study reported odds ratio favouring no eye protection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.99, 3.0). The high heterogeneity between studies precluded any meaningful meta-analysis. None of the studies adjusted for potential confounders such as other protective behaviours, thus increasing the risk of bias, and decreasing the certainty of evidence to very low.

Conclusions: Current studies suggest that eye protection may play a role in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. However, robust comparative trials are needed to clearly determine effectiveness of eye protections and wearability issues in both healthcare and general populations.

Keywords: COVID-19; Eye protection; Face shield; Infection prevention; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening and selection of articles
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of effect of eye protection in healthcare professionals

References

    1. Coroneo MT, Collignon PJ. SARS-CoV-2: eye protection might be the missing key. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(5):e173–e174. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00040-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maxcy KF. The transmission of infection through the eye. JAMA. 1919;72:636–639. doi: 10.1001/jama.1919.02610090020005. - DOI
    1. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973–1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perencevich EN, Diekema DJ, Edmond MB. Moving personal protective equipment into the community: face shields and containment of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2252–2253. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7477. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhaskar ME, Arun S. SARS-CoV-2 infection among community health workers in india before and after use of face shields. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1348–1349. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.15586. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms