Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Nov 9;78(19):1875-1885.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.061.

Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Gilles Rioufol et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence that fractional flow reserve (FFR) is effective in guiding therapeutic strategy in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) beyond prespecified percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary graft surgery candidates.

Objectives: The FUTURE (FUnctional Testing Underlying coronary REvascularization) trial aimed to evaluate whether a treatment strategy based on FFR was superior to a traditional strategy without FFR in the treatment of multivessel CAD.

Methods: The FUTURE trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label superiority trial. Multivessel CAD candidates were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment strategy based on FFR in all stenotic (≥50%) coronary arteries or to a traditional strategy without FFR. In the FFR group, revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery) was indicated for FFR ≤0.80 lesions. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year.

Results: The trial was stopped prematurely by the data safety and monitoring board after a safety analysis and 927 patients were enrolled. At 1-year follow-up, by intention to treat, there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events rates between groups (14.6% in the FFR group vs 14.4% in the control group; hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.36; P = 0.85). The difference in all-cause mortality was nonsignificant, 3.7% in the FFR group versus 1.5% in the control group (hazard ratio: 2.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-5.18; P = 0.06), and this was confirmed with a 24 months' extended follow-up. FFR significantly reduced the proportion of revascularized patients, with more patients referred to exclusively medical treatment (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: In patients with multivessel CAD, we did not find evidence that an FFR-guided treatment strategy reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death at 1-year follow-up. (Functional Testing Underlying Coronary Revascularisation; NCT01881555).

Keywords: coronary artery disease; coronary revascularization strategy; fractional flow reserve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by an academic grant (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National) from the French Government, and the Hospices Civils de Lyon was the academic sponsor, involved in the collection and verification of all the study data. St Jude Medical and Volcano provided 46% of fractional flow reserve wires without any charge. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data