Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 4.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16112. Online ahead of print.

Decision aids for breast cancer screening in women approximately 50 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Lin Yu  1 , Shu Yang  1 , Chunmiao Zhang  2 , Pingping Guo  1 , Xuehui Zhang  1 , Mengmeng Xu  1 , Qi Tian  1 , Xuan Cui  1 , Wei Zhang  1 , Shuang Fan  2
Affiliations
Review

Decision aids for breast cancer screening in women approximately 50 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Lin Yu et al. J Clin Nurs. .

Abstract

Aims and objectives: Review the content, quality and effect of breast cancer screening decision aids (BCS-DAs) in women approximately 50 years of age to provide a basis for the development of DAs.

Background: Breast cancer screening (BCS) decisions are complex and should vary depending on a woman's risk of breast cancer and her values and preferences. Decision aids (DAs) can help support women and medical staff in shared decision-making (SDM) when solving BCS problems.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Four databases were searched starting at the time of establishment of the database to March 2021. The PRISMA checklist was followed. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3 software. The quality of the studies was assessed using the risk of bias tool recommended by the Cochrane Handbook. The quality of the DAs was assessed using the International Standards for Decision Aid (IPDASi v4.0).

Results: The search strategy obtained 2024 references. After abstraction and full text screening, a total of seven studies were included. This article systematically reviews the content, quality and effectiveness of DAs in seven RCTs in helping women to make BCS decisions. The DAs were mostly in paper or online form and displayed disease screening information, analysed the benefits and harms of options and clarified the value to patients. Among all the DAs, only one met the minimum quality standards of IPDASi v4.0. Comprehensive analysis shows that DAs can significantly improve knowledge and increase the proportion of women who make informed choices, but they have no effect on screening attitude, intention, decision conflict or regret.

Conclusions: In the future, nurses should be encouraged to develop DAs in accordance with strict standards and to make them applicable to young women of different backgrounds.

Relevance to clinical practice: The result may be provide a basis for the development of DAs to promote women's informed screening choices.

Keywords: breast cancer screening; decision aids; decision conflict; decision support techniques; informed choice; nursing; systematic review; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bekker, H. L. (2010). The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: Do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions? Patient Education and Counseling, 78(3), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.002
    1. Clifford, A. M., Ryan, J., Walsh, C., & McCurtin, A. (2017). What information is used in treatment decision aids? A systematic review of the types of evidence populating health decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0415-7
    1. Copas, J., & Shi, J. Q. (2000). Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis. Biostatistics, 1(3), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
    1. Coviello, V., Buzzoni, C., Fusco, M., Barchielli, A., Cuccaro, F., De Angelis, R., & Mangone, L. (2017). Survival of cancer patients in Italy. Epidemiologia E Prevenzione, 41(2 Suppl 1), 1-244. https://doi.org/10.19191/ep17.2s1.P001.017 (La sopravvivenza dei pazienti oncologici in Italia.)
    1. Cuevas, A. G., O'Brien, K., & Saha, S. (2019). Can patient-centered communication reduce the effects of medical mistrust on patients’ decision making? Health Psychology, 38(4), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000721

LinkOut - more resources