Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;26(44):2100441.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100441.

Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021

Affiliations

Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021

Heinrich Scheiblauer et al. Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Author's correction for Euro Surveill. 2021;26(44).
    Eurosurveillance editorial team. Eurosurveillance editorial team. Euro Surveill. 2022 Jan;27(3):210120c. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.27.3.210120c. Euro Surveill. 2022. PMID: 35057898 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

IntroductionNumerous CE-marked SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag RDT) are offered in Europe, several of them with unconfirmed quality claims.AimWe performed an independent head-to-head evaluation of the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT offered in Germany.MethodsWe addressed the sensitivity of 122 Ag RDT in direct comparison using a common evaluation panel comprised of 50 specimens. Minimum sensitivity of 75% for panel specimens with a PCR quantification cycle (Cq) ≤ 25 was used to identify Ag RDT eligible for reimbursement in the German healthcare system.ResultsThe sensitivity of different SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT varied over a wide range. The sensitivity limit of 75% for panel members with Cq ≤ 25 was met by 96 of the 122 tests evaluated; 26 tests exhibited lower sensitivity, few of which failed completely. Some RDT exhibited high sensitivity, e.g. 97.5 % for Cq < 30.ConclusionsThis comparative evaluation succeeded in distinguishing less sensitive from better performing Ag RDT. Most of the evaluated Ag RDT appeared to be suitable for fast identification of acute infections associated with high viral loads. Market access of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT should be based on minimal requirements for sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords: CE mark; COVID 19; SARS-CoV-2 antigen; rapid diagnostic test; sensitivity evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Comment in

References

    1. Wagenhäuser I, Knies K, Rauschenberger V, Eisenmann M, McDonogh M, Petri N, et al. Clinical performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in point of care usage in comparison to RT-qPCR. EBioMedicine. 2021;69:103455. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103455 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brümmer LE, Katzenschlager S, Gaeddert M, Erdmann C, Schmitz S, Bota M, et al. Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2021;18(8):e1003735. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003735 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Commission. Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 1998. 7.12.98:L331/1EN. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31998L0079...
    1. Mbunkah HA, Reinhardt J, Kafere C, Scheiblauer H, Prat I, Nübling CM. In vitro diagnostics for screening the blood supply: the new European regulation for IVD and the WHO IVD prequalification programme. Vox Sang. 2021;116(1):3-12. 10.1111/vox.12996 - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. 5.5.2017:L 117/176. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/746/oj

Substances