Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
- PMID: 34738515
- PMCID: PMC8569926
- DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100441
Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
Erratum in
-
Author's correction for Euro Surveill. 2021;26(44).Euro Surveill. 2022 Jan;27(3):210120c. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.27.3.210120c. Euro Surveill. 2022. PMID: 35057898 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
IntroductionNumerous CE-marked SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag RDT) are offered in Europe, several of them with unconfirmed quality claims.AimWe performed an independent head-to-head evaluation of the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT offered in Germany.MethodsWe addressed the sensitivity of 122 Ag RDT in direct comparison using a common evaluation panel comprised of 50 specimens. Minimum sensitivity of 75% for panel specimens with a PCR quantification cycle (Cq) ≤ 25 was used to identify Ag RDT eligible for reimbursement in the German healthcare system.ResultsThe sensitivity of different SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT varied over a wide range. The sensitivity limit of 75% for panel members with Cq ≤ 25 was met by 96 of the 122 tests evaluated; 26 tests exhibited lower sensitivity, few of which failed completely. Some RDT exhibited high sensitivity, e.g. 97.5 % for Cq < 30.ConclusionsThis comparative evaluation succeeded in distinguishing less sensitive from better performing Ag RDT. Most of the evaluated Ag RDT appeared to be suitable for fast identification of acute infections associated with high viral loads. Market access of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT should be based on minimal requirements for sensitivity and specificity.
Keywords: CE mark; COVID 19; SARS-CoV-2 antigen; rapid diagnostic test; sensitivity evaluation.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Measuring diagnostic performance of COVID-19 tests: lessons for the next pandemic.Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(45):2101050. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.45.2101050. Euro Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34763755 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- European Commission. Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 1998. 7.12.98:L331/1EN. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31998L0079...
-
- European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. 5.5.2017:L 117/176. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/746/oj
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous