Cell cycle checkpoint control in response to DNA damage by environmental stresses
- PMID: 34741364
- DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15567
Cell cycle checkpoint control in response to DNA damage by environmental stresses
Abstract
Being sessile organisms, plants are ubiquitously exposed to stresses that can affect the DNA replication process or cause DNA damage. To cope with these problems, plants utilize DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, consisting of both highly conserved and plant-specific elements. As a part of this DDR, cell cycle checkpoint control mechanisms either pause the cell cycle, to allow DNA repair, or lead cells into differentiation or programmed cell death, to prevent the transmission of DNA errors in the organism through mitosis or to its offspring via meiosis. The two major DDR cell cycle checkpoints control either the replication process or the G2/M transition. The latter is largely overseen by the plant-specific SOG1 transcription factor, which drives the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and MYB3R proteins, which are rate limiting for the G2/M transition. By contrast, the replication checkpoint is controlled by different players, including the conserved kinase WEE1 and likely the transcriptional repressor RBR1. These checkpoint mechanisms are called upon during developmental processes, in retrograde signaling pathways, and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, including metal toxicity, cold, salinity, and phosphate deficiency. Additionally, the recent expansion of research from Arabidopsis to other model plants has revealed species-specific aspects of the DDR. Overall, it is becoming evidently clear that the DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms represent an important aspect of the adaptation of plants to a changing environment, hence gaining more knowledge about this topic might be helpful to increase the resilience of plants to climate change.
Keywords: DNA damage; cell cycle progression; checkpoint control; environmental stress.
© 2021 Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abel, S. (2011) Phosphate sensing in root development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PBI.2011.04.007
-
- Adachi, S., Minamisawa, K., Okushima, Y., Inagaki, S., Yoshiyama, K., Kondou, Y. et al. (2011) Programmed induction of endoreduplication by DNA double-strand breaks in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(24), 10004-10009. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103584108
-
- Afridi, M.N., Lee, W.-H. & Kim, J.-O. (2019) Effect of phosphate concentration, anions, heavy metals, and organic matter on phosphate adsorption from wastewater using anodized iron oxide nanoflakes. Environmental Research, 171, 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2019.01.055
-
- Aklilu, B.B., Soderquist, R.S. & Culligan, K.M. (2014) Genetic analysis of the replication protein A large subunit family in Arabidopsis reveals unique and overlapping roles in DNA repair, meiosis and DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Research, 42(5), 3104-3118. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1292
-
- Amiard, S., Charbonnel, C., Allain, E., Depeiges, A., White, C.I., Gallego, M.E. et al. (2010) Distinct roles of the ATR kinase and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex in the maintenance of chromosomal stability in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 22(9), 3020-3033. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.078527
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
