Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;31(4):977-996.
doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00295-y. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

Educating for Responsible Research Practice in Biomedical Sciences: Towards Learning Goals

Affiliations

Educating for Responsible Research Practice in Biomedical Sciences: Towards Learning Goals

Elianne M Gerrits et al. Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022.

Abstract

New developments in the field of biomedicine can have extensive implications for society. To steer research efforts in a responsible direction, biomedical scientists should contribute to a forward-looking ethical, and societal evaluation of new developments. However, the question remains how to equip students sufficiently with the skills they need to contribute to this evaluation. In this paper, we examine how the four dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation (anticipation, reflexivity, inclusivity, and responsiveness) inform the identification of learning goals and teaching approaches that contribute to developing these skills in biomedical scientists. We suggest that these educational approaches focus on the skills to anticipate intended and unintended outcomes, reflect on the epistemological and moral aspects of research practice, and be inclusive of the variety of voices in society. We argue that if these dimensions are properly integrated into biomedical curricula, they will help students develop the attitudinal aspects necessary for becoming responsive, and prepare them for implementing the dimensions of responsible research into their daily practice. This paper focuses specifically on skills biomedical scientists need for the responsible conduct of research. Therefore, our analysis results, at least in part, in domain-specific recommendations. We invite educators from other disciplines to do the same exercise, as we believe this could lead to tailored educational approaches by which students from various disciplinary backgrounds learn how they each have a role in contributing to socially robust and morally responsible research practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(10), 1057–1095. 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
    1. Akgun S, Kaya E. How do university students perceive the nature of science? Science and Education. 2020;29(2):299–330. doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00105-x. - DOI
    1. Akker, J. van den, Bannan, B., Kelly, A., Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational Design Research, 204. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11
    1. Allchin D. Should the sociology of science be rated X? Science Education. 2004;88(6):934–946. doi: 10.1002/sce.20026. - DOI
    1. Assen LS, Jongsma KR, Isasi R, Tryfonidou MA, Bredenoord AL. Stem cell reports broadening the scope. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources