Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22:12:708890.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.708890. eCollection 2021.

A 3-Biomarker 2-Point-Based Risk Stratification Strategy in Acute Heart Failure

Affiliations

A 3-Biomarker 2-Point-Based Risk Stratification Strategy in Acute Heart Failure

Jesús Álvarez-García et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Most multi-biomarker strategies in acute heart failure (HF) have only measured biomarkers in a single-point time. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic yielding of NT-proBNP, hsTnT, Cys-C, hs-CRP, GDF15, and GAL-3 in HF patients both at admission and discharge. Methods: We included 830 patients enrolled consecutively in a prospective multicenter registry. Primary outcome was 12-month mortality. The gain in the C-index, calibration, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was calculated after adding each individual biomarker value or their combination on top of the best clinical model developed in this study (C-index 0.752, 0.715-0.789) and also on top of 4 currently used scores (MAGGIC, GWTG-HF, Redin-SCORE, BCN-bioHF). Results: After 12-month, death occurred in 154 (18.5%) cases. On top of the best clinical model, the addition of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 above the respective cutoff point at admission and discharge and their delta during compensation improved the C-index to 0.782 (0.747-0.817), IDI by 5% (p < 0.001), and NRI by 57% (p < 0.001) for 12-month mortality. A 4-risk grading categories for 12-month mortality (11.7, 19.2, 26.7, and 39.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) were obtained using combination of these biomarkers. Conclusion: A model including NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 measured at admission and discharge afforded a mortality risk prediction greater than our clinical model and also better than the most currently used scores. In addition, this 3-biomarker panel defined 4-risk categories for 12-month mortality.

Keywords: acute heart failure (AHF); biomarker (BM); panel (C33); prognosis; risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Risk categories based on the values of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 in the study population. Upper panel: our study identified 4-risk categories for 12-month all-cause mortality based on the values of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15: (1) a low-risk category (blue line) included 529 patients presenting none or 1 biomarker above the cutoff values at admission and discharge, (2) a low-intermediate risk category (green line) included 78 patients presenting 2 or 3 elevated biomarkers at admission and none or 1 at discharge, (3) a high-intermediate category (orange line) included 86 patients presenting none or 1 elevated biomarker at admission and 2 or 3 elevated biomarkers at discharge, and (4) a high-risk category (red line) included 137 patients presenting 2 or 3 elevated biomarkers both at admission and discharge. Bottom panel: The 12-month mortality rate for these 4 categories was, respectively, 11.7, 19.2, 26.7, and 39.4%. Considering the low risk category as reference, the mortality risk-ratio was 1.64 (95% CI: 0.98–2.74) for the low-intermediate; 2.28 (95% CI: 1.50–3.48) for the high-intermediate; and 3.36 (95% CI: 2.46–4.60) for the highest risk categories.

References

    1. Álvarez-García J., Ferrero-Gregori A., Puig T., Vázquez R., Delgado J., Pascual-Figal D., et al. (2015). A simple validated method for predicting the risk of hospitalization for worsening of heart failure in ambulatory patients: the Redin-SCORE. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 17 818–827. 10.1002/ejhf.287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjurman C., Jensen J., Petzold M., Hammarsten O., Fu M. L. X. (2013). Assessment of a multimarker strategy for prediction of mortality in older heart failure patients: a cohort study. BMJ Open 3:e002254. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002254 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braunwald E. (2008). Biomarkers in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 358 2148–2159. 10.1056/NEJMra0800239 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chow S. L., Maisel A. S., Anand I., Bozkurt B., de Boer R. A., Felker G. M., et al. (2017). Role of biomarkers for the prevention, assessment, and management of heart failure: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation 135 1054–1091. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000490 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demissei B. G., Cotter G., Prescott M. F., Felker G. M., Filippatos G., Greenberg B. H., et al. (2017a). A multimarker multi-time point-based risk stratification strategy in acute heart failure: results from the RELAX-AHF trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 19 1001–1010. 10.1002/ejhf.749 - DOI - PubMed