Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 21:12:726817.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726817. eCollection 2021.

The Study of Security Priming on Avoidant Attentional Biases: Combining Microsaccadic Eye-Movement Measurement With a Dot-Probe Task

Affiliations

The Study of Security Priming on Avoidant Attentional Biases: Combining Microsaccadic Eye-Movement Measurement With a Dot-Probe Task

Rebecca Louise Mellor et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Microsaccades are small fixational eye movements that have shown to index covert attentional shifts. The present experiment combined microsaccades with performance measures from a dot-probe task to study influences of attachment security priming on the attentional biases of individuals high in attachment avoidance. Security priming is an experimental manipulation aimed at boosting felt security. Using a randomized, mixed design, we measured differences in attentional vigilance toward angry and neutral faces as a function of priming (neutral vs. secure) and attachment avoidance. Individuals high in avoidance habitually tend to withdraw from, or otherwise dismiss, emotionally salient stimuli. Here, we operationalized attentional withdrawal based on both task performance in the dot-probe task and microsaccadic movements. In addition, unlike previous studies where priming salience for the individual participant has been unclear, we used a standardized narrative method for attachment script assessment, securing an indication of how strongly each participant was primed. Dot-probe data significantly captured the link between avoidance and attentional disengagement, though from all facial stimuli (angry and neutral). Although microsaccadic movements did not capture avoidant attentional disengagement, they positively correlated to dot-probe data suggesting measurement convergence. Avoidance was associated with weaker security priming and no overall effect of priming on attention was found, indicating a need for further exploration of suitable priming methods to bypass avoidant deactivation. Our results provide a first indication that, as an implicit looking measure, microsaccadic movements can potentially reveal where early attention is directed at the exact moment of stimulus presentation.

Keywords: attachment orientation; attentional biases; avoidance; dot-probe design; eye tracking; microsaccades; security priming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attention to facial stimuli as a function of avoidance (ECR-R), as captured by the dot-probe task where orientation represents Attentional Orientation Indexes (AOIs). Y-axis values represent AOIs where a negative value indicates attentional disengagement, and a positive value indicates attentional engagement. A value of 0 indicates no attentional bias.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Attention to facial stimuli as a function of avoidance (ECR-R), as captured by microsaccades away from the stimuli.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Attention pre- and post-priming: Increased vigilance to all facial stimuli as indicated by reaction times in the dot-probe task where orientation represents Attentional Orientation Indexes (AOIs). Y-axis values represent AOIs where a negative value indicates attentional disengagement, and a positive value indicates attentional engagement. A value of 0 indicates no attentional bias.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Attention pre- and post-priming: No difference captured by analysis of microsaccades away from the stimuli.

References

    1. Alonso-Arbiol I., Bulluerka N., Shaver P. R., Gillath O. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Spanish and American versions of the ECR adult attachment questionnaire. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 24, 9–13. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.9 - DOI
    1. Andriopoulos P., Kafetsios K. (2015). Priming the secure attachment schema: effects on emotion information processing. Psihologijske Teme 24, 71–89.
    1. Aviezer O., Sagi A., Resnick G., Gini M. (2002). School competence in young adolescence: links to early attachment relationships beyond concurrent self-perceived competence and representations of relationships. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 26, 397–409. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000328 - DOI
    1. Bantin T., Stevens S., Gerlach A. L., Hermann C. (2016). What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 50, 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.009, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartholomew K., Horowitz L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61, 226–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources