Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research
- PMID: 34748689
- PMCID: PMC8849373
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13384
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research
Abstract
Background: Mixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient-oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate research methods to address issues at hand, where complex social problems need multipronged approaches. As an emerging healthcare research strategy, POR actively engages individuals with lived experience across all stages of the research process. While POR continues to garner attention within mixed-methods research designs, there is a paucity of literature that considers POR in relation to pragmatism.
Objective: As POR grows in popularity within the field of health care, there is a need to explore the theoretical and epistemological alignment with pragmatism and the implications to research.
Methods: To address this need, we provide a critical review of the literature to examine the synergies between POR and pragmatism, and argue for the adoption of pragmatism as a paradigm for conducting POR.
Main results: This article begins with a discussion of the philosophical underpinnings informing the pragmatic paradigm. It then identifies key alignments between POR and pragmatism across three intersecting concepts: democratic values, collaborative approaches to problem-solving and the pursuit of social justice.
Discussion and conclusions: Reflecting on our experiences engaging with patient partners in a mixed-methods POR study titled READY2Exit, we illustrate the relevance of pragmatism to POR by applying these concepts to practice. Implications and considerations for conducting POR within the pragmatic paradigm are also described.
Patient or public contribution: This paper provides a critical review of the literature and did not directly involve patients or the public. The authors reflected on their experiences collaborating with five young adult patient partners in the READY2Exit study (case exemplar described in this article) to demonstrate the relevance of the pragmatic paradigm to POR. We acknowledge and thank the young adult patient partners for their contributions to the research, for encouraging us to think critically about patient engagement in research, and for sharing their experiences.
Keywords: paradigm; patient engagement; patient-oriented research; pragmatic research; pragmatism; youth engagement.
© 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
References
-
- Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press; 1962.
-
- Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1(1):48‐76.
-
- Weaver K. Pragmatic paradigm. In: Frey B, ed. The Sage Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Sage; 2011:1287‐1288.
-
- Andrew S, Halcomb EJ. Mixed methods research is an effective method of enquiry for community health research. Contemp Nurse. 2007;23(2):145‐153. - PubMed
-
- Brierley JA. The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioural accounting research. Int J Behav Exp Finance. 2017;6(2):140‐154.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
