Clinical Longevity of Indirect Composite Resin Inlays and Onlays: An Up to 9-Year Prospective Study
- PMID: 34749421
- PMCID: PMC8890907
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735420
Clinical Longevity of Indirect Composite Resin Inlays and Onlays: An Up to 9-Year Prospective Study
Abstract
Objective: This clinical study evaluated the clinical performance of composite resin inlays and onlays over 9 years.
Materials and methods: Sixty composite resin inlays and onlays were placed in 32 patients, aged 20 to 60 years, by a single operator using the same clinical procedure. The restorations were examined for fracture rate; esthetics; and patient acceptance and marginal integrity, including caries, marginal discoloration, tooth integrity, and surface texture. All restorations were evaluated at the time of placement and 3, 6, and 9 years after placement by using the modified U.S. Public Health Service criteria.
Results: At the 3-year follow-up, an Alpha score was given to 88.4% of restorations, while a Bravo score was given to the remaining 11.6%. There was not any failure. At the 6-year follow-up, the success rate of the restorations was 100% without failure. None of the restorations was scored with Delta (D). An Alpha score was given to 60% of the restorations, a Bravo score was assigned to 35%, and a Charlie score was 5% of the restorations. Overall, the success rate of the restorations at 9-year follow-up was 85% and the failure rate was 15%. An Alpha score was given to 15% of the restorations, a Bravo score was given to 50%, a Charlie score was assigned to 20%, and a D score was given to 15% of the restorations.
Conclusion: Indirect resin composite inlays and onlays showed acceptable long-term clinical results. The success rate of the restorations at 9-year follow-up was 85% and the failure rate was 15%.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
-
- Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54(03):145–149. - PubMed
-
- Hayashi M, Wilson N HF, Yeung C A, Worthington H V. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(01):8–19. - PubMed
-
- Messer P F, Piddock V, Lloyd C H. The strength of dental ceramics. J Dent. 1991;19(01):51–55. - PubMed
-
- Galiatsatos A A, Bergou D. Six-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(05):407–412. - PubMed
-
- Magne P, Belser U C.Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. J Periodont Rest Dent20032306543–555. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
