Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 8;7(1):195.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00931-y.

Are some feasibility studies more feasible than others? A review of the outcomes of feasibility studies on the ISRCTN registry

Ben Morgan  1 , Jennie Hejdenberg  2 , Kasia Kuleszewicz  2 , David Armstrong  3 , Sue Ziebland  4
Affiliations
Review

Are some feasibility studies more feasible than others? A review of the outcomes of feasibility studies on the ISRCTN registry

Ben Morgan et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Feasibility studies are often conducted before committing to a randomised controlled trial (RCT), yet there is little published evidence to inform how useful feasibility studies are, especially in terms of adding or reducing waste in research. This study attempted to examine how many feasibility studies demonstrated that the full trial was feasible and whether some feasibility studies were inherently likely to be feasible or not feasible, based on the topic area and/or research setting.

Methods: Keyword searches were conducted on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) registry to identify all completed feasibility studies which had been conducted in the UK.

Results: A total of 625 records from the 1933 identified were reviewed before it became evident that it would be futile to continue. Of 329 feasibility studies identified, 160 had a known outcome (49%), 133 (83%) trials were deemed to be feasible and only 27 (17%) were reported to be non-feasible. There were therefore too few studies to allow the intended comparison of differences in non-feasible studies by topic and/or setting.

Conclusions: There were too few studies reported as non-feasible to draw any useful conclusions on whether topic and/or setting had an effect. However, the high feasibility rate (83%) may suggest that non-feasible studies are subject to publication bias or that many feasible studies are redundant and may be adding waste to the research pathway.

Keywords: Feasibility studies; Progression rates; Research waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BM, JH and KK are employed through NIHR to manage RfPB and its databases. SZ is the current Programme Director of RfPB, and DA was the Programme Director of RfPB until May 2017. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and social Care.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reasons why RCTs were not feasible
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86–89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383:156–165. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlesworth M, Klein AA, White SM. A bibliometric analysis of the conversion and reporting of pilot studies published in six anaesthesia journals. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:247–253. doi: 10.1111/anae.14817. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thabane L, Lancaster G. A guide to the reporting of protocols of pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0423-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed