Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 8;30(162):210154.
doi: 10.1183/16000617.0154-2021. Print 2021 Dec 31.

Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review

Affiliations
Review

Development and clinical translation of tubular constructs for tracheal tissue engineering: a review

Luis Soriano et al. Eur Respir Rev. .

Abstract

Effective restoration of extensive tracheal damage arising from cancer, stenosis, infection or congenital abnormalities remains an unmet clinical need in respiratory medicine. The trachea is a 10-11 cm long fibrocartilaginous tube of the lower respiratory tract, with 16-20 tracheal cartilages anterolaterally and a dynamic trachealis muscle posteriorly. Tracheal resection is commonly offered to patients suffering from short-length tracheal defects, but replacement is required when the trauma exceeds 50% of total length of the trachea in adults and 30% in children. Recently, tissue engineering (TE) has shown promise to fabricate biocompatible tissue-engineered tracheal implants for tracheal replacement and regeneration. However, its widespread use is hampered by inadequate re-epithelialisation, poor mechanical properties, insufficient revascularisation and unsatisfactory durability, leading to little success in the clinical use of tissue-engineered tracheal implants to date. Here, we describe in detail the historical attempts and the lessons learned for tracheal TE approaches by contextualising the clinical needs and essential requirements for a functional tracheal graft. TE manufacturing approaches explored to date and the clinical translation of both TE and non-TE strategies for tracheal regeneration are summarised to fully understand the big picture of tracheal TE and its impact on clinical treatment of extensive tracheal defects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: L. Soriano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Khalid has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Whelan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. O'Huallachain has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K.C. Redmond has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F.J. O'Brien has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. O'Leary has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.A. Cryan has nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Different replacement strategies investigated for tracheal replacement: a) 3D printing/bioprinting, b) casting, c) decellularisation and d) electrospinning. Images adapted from [59, 60, 70, 86] with permission.

References

    1. Boazak EM, Auguste DT. Trachea mechanics for tissue engineering design. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2018; 4: 1272–1284. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00738 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao M, Zhang H, Dong W, et al. Tissue-engineered trachea from a 3D-printed scaffold enhances whole-segment tracheal repair. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 5246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05518-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grillo HC. Tracheal replacement: a critical review. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1995–2004. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03564-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grillo HC. Slide tracheoplasty for long-segment congenital tracheal stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 613–621. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90714-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prokakis C, Koletsis EN, Dedeilias P, et al. Airway trauma: a review on epidemiology, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis and treatment. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 117. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources